Governments

Could hydrogen be the answer to wind and solar curtailment woes?

Published by

Hydrogen production could become a lifeline for wind and solar projects facing curtailment due to network infrastructure constraints, by tapping into otherwise forgone electricity generation to power electrolysers.

A growing number of renewable energy projects are being forced to cut output, both in Australia and overseas, as network and storage infrastructure – as well as market rule adjustments – lags behind the growth in new wind and solar projects.

But the ‘over building’ of wind and solar capacity could become a blessing, with the growing viability of using surplus electricity to produce zero emissions and cost competitive hydrogen.

The argument for producing hydrogen from the electricity that would otherwise be curtailed has been put forward by Gniewomir Flis, a senior analyst with UK based Aurora Energy Research and who previously worked under BloombergNEF founder Michael Liebreich.

Flis turned to Twitter to argue that, provided an electrolysis unit could be acquired at a sufficiently attractive price, it could be possible to produce hydrogen using electricity that would otherwise be foregone due to curtailment.

To become cost competitive with hydrogen produced from fossil fuels, the challenge is to build electrolysers at a sufficiently low cost. Flis cited research showing that there have been dramatic cost reductions as the global market for electrolysers grows.

Liebreich has argued that the curtailment of renewables is not as big a concern as it may seem on the surface. Due to the dramatic falls in costs, new wind and solar projects would still be able to outcompete new fossil fuel projects on cost even with significant levels of curtailment.

“Think about it: if your $20/MWh wind or solar suffers 33% curtailment, you know what happens? It turns into $30/MWh wind or solar – still half the price of power from any other source,” Liebreich said.

Analysis prepared by global consultancy McKinsey for the world Hydrogen Council found that with sufficient investment, renewable hydrogen could become cost competitive with unabated fossil fuel hydrogen within the next ten years.

The argument is similar to that made by CEO of the Australian Renewable Energy Agency, who suggested last year that Australia could aim for as much as 700 per cent renewable electricity, using the excess to produce cheap, emissions free, hydrogen for export.

Hydrogen production provides a type of ‘flexible demand’ that can be a good match with the variable nature of wind and solar generation. It creates the potential for a country like Australia, with abundant solar and wind resources, to ‘over build’ its renewable generation capacity, and use the surplus electricity to produce zero emission hydrogen.

Several energy regulators, including chair of the Energy Security Board, have argued that a future energy system will require both flexible supplies and demand.

Parts of Australia are already battling with infrastructure issues that have necessitated the curtailment of wind and solar projects.

Several renewable energy projects in Western Victoria have been forced to cut output by as much as 50 per cent, while regulators and network companies attempt to resolve constraints within transmission networks.

The value of this curtailed electricity output could be captured with the inclusion of an electrolyser producing hydrogen, which allows the energy to be stored and then used as needed.

There are a growing number of proposals to deliberately ‘overbuild’ electricity generation capacity in parts of Australia, including a proposal to build as much as 5,000MW of solar and wind capacity in Western Australia, with the intention of using surplus electricity to produce and export hydrogen.

Australia’s chief scientist, Dr Alan Finkel, who developed the National Hydrogen Strategy, has advocated for producing hydrogen using fossil fuels paired with carbon storage, at least until the cost of producing hydrogen using renewable electricity falls.

The chief scientist has also argued that it would be beneficial for Australia to identify ways to continue utilising its fossil fuel reserves, while also reducing emissions, as it would provide greater diversity of energy supplies.

Michael Mazengarb is a climate and energy policy analyst with more than 15 years of professional experience, including as a contributor to Renew Economy. He writes at Tempests and Terawatts.
Michael Mazengarb

Michael Mazengarb is a climate and energy policy analyst with more than 15 years of professional experience, including as a contributor to Renew Economy. He writes at Tempests and Terawatts.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Energy Insiders Podcast: Getting the best out of the grid

Energy expert Gabrielle Kuiper on getting the best out of distributed energy resources in the…

29 November 2024

Australian homes could slash energy bills by two thirds by cutting out gas and petrol, AEMC says

Australian households could lower their bills by over two thirds if they fully electrify their…

29 November 2024

In the end, the only blackouts were in the media headlines: But there has to be a better way to do this

Blackout featured prominently in media headlines this week, but not on the grid. But as…

29 November 2024

Trina submits approval for Victoria big battery, as locals campaign against solar and storage projects

Trinasolar and Mint Renewables have now both lodged planning applications for neighbouring big batteries in…

29 November 2024

Australia to reshape manufacturing base as Greens deal excludes fossil fuels from flagship industry policy

Greens make last minute commitment to vote for $22 billion Future Made in Australia policy…

29 November 2024

Andrew Forrest seeks green tick for another wind and battery project as Clarke Creek powers up

Andrew Forrest's Squadron Energy seeks green tick for new wind and battery project in NSW…

29 November 2024