Graph of the Day: Climate action is better for the economy

Published by

Given that Australia’s federal election is all about the economy, and conflicting policies on climate change, a new posting by Skeptical Science is timely. It addresses they myth that CO2 limits will damage economic growth. It says that not making serious efforts to curb emissions will incur serious economic costs, a conclusion made by numerous studies, including Ross Garnaut’s, but one that has yet to register in the Australian political debate circa 2013.”

“It’s not unreasonable to expect that the effects of climate change will create greater economic instability worldwide,” Skeptical Science note in their post.The solution is, of course, to reduce fossil fuel use. One way to do this is to shift away from fossil fuels towards renewable energy sources. The other way is to reduce energy demands through increased efficiency.”

The article addresses the idea that imposing a price on carbon will damage economic prospects, but notes that in the upcoming fifth IPCC Assessment Report, a new set of scenarios called Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) will be used to illustrate the trajectories for economic performance under various emissions scenarios.

Here is the table:

Figure 1: GDP projections of the four scenarios underlying the RCPs (van Vuuren et.al. 2011). Grey area for income indicates the 98th and 90th percentiles (light/dark grey) of the IPCC AR4 database (Hanaoka et al. 2006). The dotted lines indicate four of the SRES marker scenarios.

“The graph of GDP clearly shows that the pathways that reduce emissions the most in that time frame (2.6 – green, and 4.5 – red) are those with the best long-term economic performance,” the posting notes. “In other words, the investment required to reduce emissions is repaid by increased economic performance. Business as usual strategies (high-emission scenarios RCP 6 and 8.5) are the least profitable; the money saved early on is dwarfed by the costs of damage and disruption done in the longer term.”

The rest of the article can be found here.

 

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Solar Insiders Podcast: Why new rules for networks signal a new dawn for consumers

AEMC commissioner Rainer Korte on what the new rules on reporting and data sharing will…

17 July 2026

Developer lands “complete funding package” to begin building state’s largest solar-battery hybrid

Developer says it is good to go on early works and construction of the largest…

17 July 2026

“A really big game-changer:” AEMO looks to battery inverters as syncons prove expensive and hard to find

AEMO says proof that grid forming battery inverters can deliver heartbeat of the grid will…

17 July 2026

Twiggy Forrest’s Squadron abandons plan for troubled New England wind farm

Days after lodging new plans for a more than 500 MW wind farm, Squadron dumps…

17 July 2026

Energy Insiders Podcast: Is Australia on target for a “step change” in energy?

AEMO’S head of systems Nicola Falcon on the 2026 ISP and the importance of grid…

17 July 2026

Australia’s solar PV recycling plans on hold after flagship pilot project suspended

Flagship pilot program to set up 100 sites around the country to collect used solar…

17 July 2026