Graph of the Day: Climate action is better for the economy

Published by

Given that Australia’s federal election is all about the economy, and conflicting policies on climate change, a new posting by Skeptical Science is timely. It addresses they myth that CO2 limits will damage economic growth. It says that not making serious efforts to curb emissions will incur serious economic costs, a conclusion made by numerous studies, including Ross Garnaut’s, but one that has yet to register in the Australian political debate circa 2013.”

“It’s not unreasonable to expect that the effects of climate change will create greater economic instability worldwide,” Skeptical Science note in their post.The solution is, of course, to reduce fossil fuel use. One way to do this is to shift away from fossil fuels towards renewable energy sources. The other way is to reduce energy demands through increased efficiency.”

The article addresses the idea that imposing a price on carbon will damage economic prospects, but notes that in the upcoming fifth IPCC Assessment Report, a new set of scenarios called Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) will be used to illustrate the trajectories for economic performance under various emissions scenarios.

Here is the table:

Figure 1: GDP projections of the four scenarios underlying the RCPs (van Vuuren et.al. 2011). Grey area for income indicates the 98th and 90th percentiles (light/dark grey) of the IPCC AR4 database (Hanaoka et al. 2006). The dotted lines indicate four of the SRES marker scenarios.

“The graph of GDP clearly shows that the pathways that reduce emissions the most in that time frame (2.6 – green, and 4.5 – red) are those with the best long-term economic performance,” the posting notes. “In other words, the investment required to reduce emissions is repaid by increased economic performance. Business as usual strategies (high-emission scenarios RCP 6 and 8.5) are the least profitable; the money saved early on is dwarfed by the costs of damage and disruption done in the longer term.”

The rest of the article can be found here.

 

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Golden moment: Australia’s biggest wind farm becomes first to reach 1 GW of output

Australia's biggest operating wind farm has set a stunning new record, becoming the first in…

12 June 2026

The quiet battery: What household batteries reveal about flexibility before full orchestration

The passive battery is not a new phenomenon. What is new is that its value…

12 June 2026

State utility eyes 8-12 hour energy storage investment after “standout” success of four-hour big battery

State-owned utility says it is in discussions to invest in non-lithium technologies with up to…

12 June 2026

Depleted batteries and very expensive gas: How a two-day heatwave led to a near doubling of quarterly prices

Batteries have been protecting consumers from price spikes in most states over summer. But they…

12 June 2026

Solar Insiders Podcast: The public power company plugging the gaps

State Electricity Commission CEO Chris Miller on how the government-owned energy company is filling gaps…

12 June 2026

Australia’s electricity market needs better price signals that reflect local conditions

Australia’s electricity prices ignore location, even though the grid doesn’t. This mismatch drives congestion, curtailment,…

12 June 2026