Graph of the Day: Climate action is better for the economy

Published by

Given that Australia’s federal election is all about the economy, and conflicting policies on climate change, a new posting by Skeptical Science is timely. It addresses they myth that CO2 limits will damage economic growth. It says that not making serious efforts to curb emissions will incur serious economic costs, a conclusion made by numerous studies, including Ross Garnaut’s, but one that has yet to register in the Australian political debate circa 2013.”

“It’s not unreasonable to expect that the effects of climate change will create greater economic instability worldwide,” Skeptical Science note in their post.The solution is, of course, to reduce fossil fuel use. One way to do this is to shift away from fossil fuels towards renewable energy sources. The other way is to reduce energy demands through increased efficiency.”

The article addresses the idea that imposing a price on carbon will damage economic prospects, but notes that in the upcoming fifth IPCC Assessment Report, a new set of scenarios called Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) will be used to illustrate the trajectories for economic performance under various emissions scenarios.

Here is the table:

Figure 1: GDP projections of the four scenarios underlying the RCPs (van Vuuren et.al. 2011). Grey area for income indicates the 98th and 90th percentiles (light/dark grey) of the IPCC AR4 database (Hanaoka et al. 2006). The dotted lines indicate four of the SRES marker scenarios.

“The graph of GDP clearly shows that the pathways that reduce emissions the most in that time frame (2.6 – green, and 4.5 – red) are those with the best long-term economic performance,” the posting notes. “In other words, the investment required to reduce emissions is repaid by increased economic performance. Business as usual strategies (high-emission scenarios RCP 6 and 8.5) are the least profitable; the money saved early on is dwarfed by the costs of damage and disruption done in the longer term.”

The rest of the article can be found here.

 

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

“A weapon for deep sea wind power:” Goldwind rolls out first 22MW offshore turbine

Goldwind says its first 22 ME offshore wind turbine will be a "weapon" on costs,…

18 December 2024

Solar swing state: From nearly too much grid demand to warnings of not enough in less than a day

In less than 24 hours Victoria went from having record demand to warnings of having…

18 December 2024

Zen inks deal with pumped hydro and hyrogen hopeful to help large energy users kick fossil habit

Zen Energy signs memorandum of understanding to develop a smart software based "24/7 Sustainable Energy…

18 December 2024

Renew Economy is changing our reader comments platform

From December 19, 2024, Renew Economy will be changing its article comment platform. And for…

18 December 2024

Solar farm and battery emerge from rhombus of regret with bank finance and a construction plan

Financial close has been reached for a long awaited solar and battery project pitched originally…

18 December 2024

UK-based Cubico closes deal with banks for 500MW wind project, its first in Australia

One of world's largest privately owned renewable energy developers reaches financial close on 500 MW…

18 December 2024