Capitalism must change to avert climate change, according to the vice-chair of the world’s largest asset manager, Blackrock.
Two weeks ago, Blackrock boss Larry Fink shook the corporate world with a letter demanding social responsibility in return for the support of his company, which manages around $6 trillion in assets.
On Wednesday at the annual World Economic Forum in Davos, Philipp Hildebrand expanded on that theme in a discussion of “fiduciary duty” – the responsibility to make clients the best return on their investments.
The concept was “evolving” to show failure to factor in environmental, social and governance factors would be a breach, he said, calling on academics to look more deeply at the issue. The European Commission recently launched a public consultation calling for contributions from the financial world.
“We will hopefully demonstrate that at a minimum there is not a negative trade-off and there may even be better performance,” said Hildebrand.
That would mean funds like Blackrock could become duty-bound to consider environmental risks such as climate change while making investments. It would create a dramatic shift, he said, but warned it would take time.
“We have to be realistic, we also have an enterprise to run, we have shareholders, this is a complicated story. Nobody is served by reducing this to very simple, fast things that we have to do immediately.
We have to change capitalism. This is really what’s at stake here. And frankly we need a new contract between companies, investors and governments,” said Hildebrand.
Former US president Al Gore, who was on the panel with the Blackrock executive, agreed that the field of research was still evolving.
But he said: “In 26 sectors of the economy, the vast majority of them, the companies that integrate ESG (environmental, social and governance) into their business plans perform better.”
He added: “For many years investors and asset managers have said ‘well I would like to invest with attention to these things, but my fiduciary duty to my clients keeps me from doing it’.
The revolutionary change… is that now it may be becoming clear that if you do not integrate these factors into your investing, you’re violating your fiduciary responsibilities.”
Blackrock’s activist rhetoric on climate change and sustainability is not new. In 2016, Fink called on companies to consider climate risk.
Last year, Blackrock hired Brian Deese, a former senior advisor to president Barack Obama, to head up its $195 billion Sustainable Investing group. Deese was a key advisor to the president on climate and part of the US team that negotiated the Paris climate accord.
Critics note that most of Blackrock’s money is in passive funds, limiting its ability to shape the market by divesting from unsustainable businesses.
The investor has other ways of exerting pressure, though. Last year it backed a shareholder resolution forcing oil giant Exxon Mobil to report on its exposure to climate risks. As a shareholder, it can also vote for board members.
This article originally appeared on Climate Home News.
Germany should not count on future long-distance green hydrogen imports in its drive to make…
New research finds a “clear case of price gouging” by Australia’s two biggest energy retailers,…
Opposition energy spokesman Ted O'Brien reportedly wants to drop environmental considerations - or what he…
New analysis shows that Coalition nuclear plan would result in more coal, more gas, higher…
Regulator proposes new laws to require gas companies to offer clear and accurate comparisons with…
There was a whole country who swallowed a lie - about coal, gas, and nuclear.…