Axeing carbon tax could deliver $40bn budget hit

Published by

As the federal treasurer Joe Hockey targets welfare spending in what is shaping up to be a radical budget overhaul, new data has revealed that revenue losses from scrapping Australia’s carbon pricing scheme, combined with the redirection of taxpayer funds to the Emissions Reduction Fund (ERF), will have a $24-$40 billion fiscal impact on the federal budget out to 2020.

In a climate policy brief released on Wednesday, The Climate Institute outlines the cost to the budget from the ERF and removal of the carbon price under a number of different scenarios, and concludes that repealing the carbon laws and their revenue is not only a high risk climate gamble, but a high stakes fiscal gamble.

“To 2020, the Government’s carbon pollution policy hits the budget with a $24 billion impact, while all publicly available independent assessments estimate increasing carbon pollution over that time,” said John Connor, CEO of The Climate Institute – noting that this sum could cover funding for the Gonski school reforms to 2020, or for the National Disability Insurance Scheme over that period.

Meanwhile, achieving pollution as well as expenditure targets would cost around $40 billion, the report said – the equivalent of total annual spending on pensions.

“This budgetary impact not only affects broader choices but the loss of carbon revenue also threatens funds now supporting clean energy, low emission programs, technology research and development, as well as support for households and business.”

“Over the four years of the forward estimates, the Government has indicated it would spend $2.55 billion of taxpayer funds to subsidise emission reduction activities via the ERF, while at the same time losing $12.55 billion from companies paying the carbon price for next financial year and purchasing permits under the European linked carbon trading scheme from 1 July 2015,” said Connor. “That adds up to an over $15 billion slug.”

Reports in the media suggest the proposed debt levy would raise $8.8 billion over four years.

The “even bigger problem,” says Connor, is that in the absence of credible climate policy, Australia’s national emissions are projected to grow by 30 per cent by 2030.

“Even using the most generous assumptions to drive credible levels low pollution investments, the government would need to be spending $3-$5 billion every year by 2030,” he said.

Sophie Vorrath

Sophie is editor of One Step Off The Grid and deputy editor of its sister site, Renew Economy. She is the co-host of the Solar Insiders Podcast. Sophie has been writing about clean energy for more than a decade.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Build it and they will come: Transmission is key, but LNP make it harder and costlier

Transmission remains the fundamental building block to decarbonising the grid. But the LNP is making…

23 December 2024

Snowy Hunter gas project hit by more delays and blowouts, with total cost now more than $2 billion

Snowy blames bad weather for yet more delays to controversial Hunter gas project, now expected…

23 December 2024

Happy holidays: We will be back soon

In 2024, Renew Economy's traffic jumped 50 per cent to more than 24 million page…

20 December 2024

Solar Insiders Podcast: A roller coaster year in review – and the keys to a smoother 2025

In our final episode for the year, SunWiz's Warwick Johnston on the highs and the…

20 December 2024

CEFC creates buzz with record investment in poles and wires, as Marinus bill blows out again

CEFC winds up 2024 with record investment in two huge transmission projects, as Marinus reveals…

20 December 2024

How big utilities manipulate the energy market, even with a high share of wind and solar

Regulator says big energy players are manipulating prices to their benefit. It's not illegal, but…

20 December 2024