Renewables

Boycotts, abuse and threat: Wind and solar landowners face intimidation and harassment

Published by

Verbally abusing children, boycotts of a farming business, and painting threatening messages on roads are just some of the intimidation tactics being used against people who host renewable energy projects.

These examples were detailed in the Clean Energy Council’s submission to the Senate inquiry into climate and energy mis- and dis-information.

It is one of the few submissions of the 150-and-counting to describe how individual landowners are being treated, and mirror reports by New South Wales Energy & Water Ombudsman Janine Young who told similar stories about landowner ostracism at the Australian Energy Week talk in June.

Clean Energy Council chief policy and impact officer William Churchill lays the blame for this breakdown in communities and behaviour at the door of false information being spread online. 

“Clean Energy Council Members are reporting a direct increase in the level of hostility and intimidation directed at farmers and their families that are hosting clean energy infrastructure,” he says in the submission. 

“We believe this activity is directly correlated with the increase in misinformation and disinformation circulating through digital platforms and is playing a substantial role in driving community tensions.”

The Senate inquiry is looking into climate and energy mis- and disinformation campaigns, and foreign and local organisations funding “astroturfing” – fake grassroots movements that are actually coordinated marketing campaigns.

Many of the submissions claim the government is the biggest purveyor of these campaigns, and a number of individuals’ submissions outline anxiety over having big projects near homes. 

But it’s landowners who are facing the wrath of groups opposed to renewables, or to projects in their areas, alone and online forums are making the problems worse, Churchill says.

“The increasing mis- and disinformation circulating freely online is creating conditions that intensify psychosocial risk factors leading to unsafe environments for hosts, workers and members of communities,” he says.

“Inflamed tensions in communities unnecessarily fuels conflict between hosts of renewable projects and neighbouring landholders and community members. 

“This has real and concerning consequences including bullying, intimidation, harassment, fear and confusion in communities, and even threats to the lives of those working in the sector.”

The submission described an anonymous case study where the daughter of a landowner who hosts a renewable energy project was verbally abused while at the local pub by a member of a local anti-renewables group.

That group has since organised a local boycott of the landowner’s grain business, and “there is a growing sense that opposition groups are coordinating efforts to economically isolate landowners who support renewable infrastructure.”

Another case study was of Lachlan Sullivan, a farmer from Boomey, NSW, who stood up in a meeting last year to try to correct some of the misinformation about the Kerrs Creek wind project. 

He says while some in the community quietly support him, he has faced backlash which has taken a toll on his health. 

Churchill says his group’s members are reporting that key messages, based on mis- and dis-information, are being copy-and-pasted and shared broadly through social media interactions, media engagement, letterbox drops, community meetings and environment and planning submissions, in a concerted effort to destabilise the industry.

“False claims spread rapidly, often amplified through emotionally charged framing and social media algorithms. This fosters confusion and resentment within communities,” he says.

“Often, the exact same text can be observed across several anti-renewables Facebook groups.”

See also: Astroturfing inquiry flooded with claims that government and climate science are the problem

And: “The grapevine will beat you every time:” How regional towns are managing anti-renewable push

And: Farmers for Climate Action hit by social media attack, says fake news drowns out rural voices

If you wish to support independent media, and accurate information, please consider making a one off donation or becoming a regular supporter of Renew Economy. Your support is invaluable.

Rachel Williamson is a science and business journalist, who focuses on climate change-related health and environmental issues.

Rachel Williamson

Rachel Williamson is a science and business journalist, who focuses on climate change-related health and environmental issues.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Vanadium: The silvery data centre storage metal that you may never have heard of

Vanadium batteries could be the answer to the expanding, energy-hungry artificial intelligence infrastructure sector, with…

9 August 2026

Bowen launches review of emission caps and credits for Australia’s biggest carbon polluters

Policy review will investigate settings for Australia's 2030 and 2035 emissions reduction targets.

7 August 2026

Energy Insiders Podcast: Will data centres make or break wind?

Kane Thornton has moved from the peak renewables body to data centres, now the presumed…

7 August 2026

Climate Active is dead. The funeral will not be certified carbon neutral

Australia's government-run "carbon neutral" certification scheme is being wound up. It is good news for…

7 August 2026

Australia’s first offshore wind auction is “going ahead as planned,” new energy minister confirms

Victoria's newly appointed energy minister says the state will go ahead as planned with Australia's…

7 August 2026

Labor’s data centre gas double-speak leaves the gate open for dodgy offsets

A promise of banning gas while waving through “gas firming” and “gas peaking” with unlimited offsets leaves…

7 August 2026