Renewables

Billionaire calls out “total BS” on Morrison’s views of wind and solar

Published by

Yesterday we wrote about Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s interview on Sky News, and how appallingly well it summed up his party’s cynical and ill-informed view – and complete lack of coherent policy – on both climate change and energy.

But, of course, we weren’t the only ones to take exception to the discussion with Sydney shock-jock Alan Jones and former Abbott advisor, Peta Credlin.

In particular, Morrison’s comments on energy were called out by billionaire tech entrepreneur and investor, Mike Cannon-Brookes, who vented his frustration at what he called ” total BS” via his Twitter account (the same one used to invite Tesla’s Elon Musk to build a big battery in South Australia, and we all know how that ended).

Cannon-Brookes was particularly miffed about Morrsion’s statement that: “we can’t run an energy system that relies on intermittent power sources like wind and solar. Look they form part of the mix, but they’re never going to be what keeps the lights on.”

The argument that “if the wind don’t blow and the sun don’t shine” then we will all get stuck in a lift and probably pee our pants is an old favourite of the Coalition’s conservative set – and used as a big tick in favour of coal, which just chugs away, regardless (unless it get too hot, or the plant is old, or …).

But as so many studies and experts have pointed out – including the Australian Energy Market Operator – centralised, slow-moving, baseload power stations are no longer fit for purpose in a carbon constrained world, with its increasingly decentralised grids.

And nor is coal power cheap, as illustrated in a Tweet from the increasingly vocal son of ex-PM Malcolm Turnbull, Alex Turnbull.

So for those who don’t understand the physics, perhaps try the economics.

Furthermore, we already have the technology – right now – to store renewable energy, and to manage it and shift it, so that its variability is not a problem. It’s just a matter of, as Cannon-Brookes put it, “making policies and stuff” to ensure it is all done smoothly and at lowest cost.

As another Twit noted, it’s really just the energy equivalent of what our water utilities – who, incidentally, are all switching to renewables – have been doing, all along, with their own intermittent resource: rain.

Indeed, compared to the rain, you can set your watch by the sun.

 

Sophie Vorrath

Sophie is editor of Renew Economy and editor of its sister site, One Step Off The Grid . She is the co-host of the Solar Insiders Podcast. Sophie has been writing about clean energy for more than a decade.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Home battery installations will match the scale of Snowy Hydro scheme – in a single year

Household battery numbers continue to defy all predictions, and they now look set to match…

16 January 2026

“Too valuable to throw out:” Labor announces first national solar panel recycling pilot program

Federal government announces $25 million for a rooftop solar recycling pilot, with up to 100…

16 January 2026

Fortescue begins work on first wind farm, with self-lifting towers and Australia’s biggest turbines

Andrew Forrest's Fortescue starts construction of its first wind farm, featuring unique "self-lifting" tower technology…

16 January 2026

Standalone battery proposed for old gravel pit gets final planning tick despite long distance objectors

A $200 million standalone battery project that attracted no objections from within 50kms of the…

16 January 2026

Australia’s climate hit regions will need fit-for-future science and modelling

It won’t come as much consolation to Victorian communities picking through the burnt rubble from…

16 January 2026

One ship loaded with solar PV is now worth more to the grid than 120 coal-carriers

Technology gains mean that one ship load of solar PV panels is now worth more…

16 January 2026