Renewables

Billionaire calls out “total BS” on Morrison’s views of wind and solar

Published by

Yesterday we wrote about Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s interview on Sky News, and how appallingly well it summed up his party’s cynical and ill-informed view – and complete lack of coherent policy – on both climate change and energy.

But, of course, we weren’t the only ones to take exception to the discussion with Sydney shock-jock Alan Jones and former Abbott advisor, Peta Credlin.

In particular, Morrison’s comments on energy were called out by billionaire tech entrepreneur and investor, Mike Cannon-Brookes, who vented his frustration at what he called ” total BS” via his Twitter account (the same one used to invite Tesla’s Elon Musk to build a big battery in South Australia, and we all know how that ended).

Cannon-Brookes was particularly miffed about Morrsion’s statement that: “we can’t run an energy system that relies on intermittent power sources like wind and solar. Look they form part of the mix, but they’re never going to be what keeps the lights on.”

The argument that “if the wind don’t blow and the sun don’t shine” then we will all get stuck in a lift and probably pee our pants is an old favourite of the Coalition’s conservative set – and used as a big tick in favour of coal, which just chugs away, regardless (unless it get too hot, or the plant is old, or …).

But as so many studies and experts have pointed out – including the Australian Energy Market Operator – centralised, slow-moving, baseload power stations are no longer fit for purpose in a carbon constrained world, with its increasingly decentralised grids.

And nor is coal power cheap, as illustrated in a Tweet from the increasingly vocal son of ex-PM Malcolm Turnbull, Alex Turnbull.

So for those who don’t understand the physics, perhaps try the economics.

Furthermore, we already have the technology – right now – to store renewable energy, and to manage it and shift it, so that its variability is not a problem. It’s just a matter of, as Cannon-Brookes put it, “making policies and stuff” to ensure it is all done smoothly and at lowest cost.

As another Twit noted, it’s really just the energy equivalent of what our water utilities – who, incidentally, are all switching to renewables – have been doing, all along, with their own intermittent resource: rain.

Indeed, compared to the rain, you can set your watch by the sun.

 

Sophie Vorrath

Sophie is editor of Renew Economy and editor of its sister site, One Step Off The Grid . She is the co-host of the Solar Insiders Podcast. Sophie has been writing about clean energy for more than a decade.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Chickens “coming home to roost” for next Victorian energy minister, whoever it might be

The coming three years will be exceptionally tough for Victoria's next energy minister, experts say.

28 October 2026

World’s biggest battery maker snags deal for new Australian project, sees “huge interest” in sodium tech

China battery giant reveals it has been selected as the tech partner for a major…

28 October 2026

Victoria Coalition promises quick review of transmission plans, as it soft pedals stance on renewables

Victoria's likely next energy minister seeks to woo clean energy summit, promising quick fire review…

28 October 2026

Andrew Forrest’s Fortescue signs first 3rd party supply deal for its giant Pilbara “green grid”

Andrew Forrest's Fortescue signs up owner of huge lithium mine as the first customer of…

28 October 2026

Wind and solar projects to be given revenue certainty in new market design to back 75 pct renewables target

Updated: A simplied version of the new national policy mechanism will be used to propel…

28 October 2026

WA wants more renewables, but that does not mean it needs more gas

W.A. should easily meet its 75 pct renewables target, but there is a big question…

28 October 2026