Coal

Australian coal exporters reap tens of billions of dollars in super profits from Russia’s war

Published by

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has delivered Australia’s coal exporters windfall profits of up to $45 billion, with gas exporters reaping almost as much, a new report has shown.

The Australia Institute report, dubbed From Russia With Love, reveals Australian coal export revenue reached $112 billion in 2021-22, up 186 per cent year-on-year.

Export windfall profits were between $39 billion and $45 billion, of which between $13-23 billion is directly attributable to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, TAI says.

Gas exporters saw export windfall profits of between $26 billion and $40 billion. Combined, the gas and coal export sectors have received an extra profit windfall of up to $85 billion.

A windfall profits tax could collect 100% of this revenue and be used to transition away from coal and gas, while supporting consumers to deal with high prices, TAI says.

Image: Australia Institute
Image: Australia Institute

The report comes just as the federal government proposes to cap for 12 months the price of gas at $12 a gigajoule and the price of coal to $125 a tonne in NSW and Queensland.

“Those profits serve no point, they don’t incentivise new production or new technology as everyone knows this is a temporary windfall driven by a war, in an industry that we need to be closing down,” TAI research director Rod Campbell told RenewEconomy.

“There will be modest increases in royalties and hopefully company tax payments for the commonwealth and states. But the outcome is everyone is making money from coal so there is an incentive to keep doing that, despite its problems.”

The export profits come just as Australian consumers are paying sky high prices for electricity and gas.

“Coal companies have also been making a killing while households and businesses are slugged with surging prices for Australian energy,” says TAI director Richard Denniss.

“A windfall profits tax could collect almost 100 per cent of this money for the public. This money could be being used to assist low/middle-income Australians with cost of living, and help transition our economy to cheaper, cleaner energy.”

Image: Australia Institute
Image: The Australia Institute

The overall impact of high international prices for coal and gas within the National Energy Market (NEM) down to a consumer level is unknown, because of the confidential contracts generators have with fuel suppliers.

“The best we know is Eraring in particular is exposed to international coal prices in some way. And they’re paying a premium to $125. It does matter that even one generator has this exposure and it matters that a very big generator has an exposure because they are influential in setting prices in the wholesale electricity market,” Victoria Energy Policy Centre director Bruce Mountain told RenewEconomy.

Within the wholesale market the most expensive generator sets the price for the other participants, which can have “this massively leverage effect across the whole market”, Mountain says.

Spot prices then feed into the contract market and price rises felt by a small number of influential generators suddenly have an outsized effect throughout the NEM.

Funding the new NEM

Taxing the war-profits on gas and coal exports could fund the modernisation of the NEM, The Australia Institute report suggests.

“If Queensland’s [royalty] rates were slightly uplifted at rates that only target the windfall price component, the state could have raised an additional $19 billion in 2020-21. For context, this alone could have almost funded the Australian Government’s entire $20
billion investment in its Rewiring the Nation initiative to modernise Australia’s electricity grid,” the report says.

Coal companies receive some 60 per cent of the windfall benefit with the remainder shared between governments.

Economists are calling for those gains to be taxed but, after the anti-resource super profits tax campaign by iron ore companies brought down then Prime Minister Kevin Rudd in 2012, governments have been reluctant to tread this path.

The report notes small changes the Queensland Government has made to its royalty rates that now includes a top marginal rate of 40 per cent appears impressive, this applies only to prices above $350 per tonne. Average royalty rates remain low at just 28 percent. At traditionally high prices such as $200 per tonne, an average rate of only 11 percent applies.

Rachel Williamson is a science and business journalist, who focuses on climate change-related health and environmental issues.

Rachel Williamson

Rachel Williamson is a science and business journalist, who focuses on climate change-related health and environmental issues.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Audit shows renewables driving down wholesale power prices in state where targets to be scrapped

New data shows wholesale electricity prices in one state fell by nearly 40% over the…

16 December 2024

Wind and solar smash output records as grid demand hits new highs in midst of heatwave

South Australia smashes demand record but prices remain negative because wind and solar supplied nearly…

16 December 2024

SwitchedOn Podcast: Pathway to electrification being blocked by fossil gas

IEEFA's Amandine Denis-Ryan explains why new gas supplies are not needed in the long term,…

16 December 2024

DT Infrastructure to deliver Goulburn River solar farm for Lightsource bp

DT Infrastructure has been awarded the contract to deliver the Goulburn River solar farm by…

16 December 2024

Victoria council to oppose solar and battery project amid worries about heat islands, views and farm impacts

The Campaspe Shire Council is opposing the 500 MW Cooba solar farm, standing alongside its…

16 December 2024

Green steam: US oil giant taps Australian thermal storage start-up for “real-world” trial

NSW company spun out of University of Newcastle tapped by US oil giant to work…

16 December 2024