Other Good Stuff

Australia finds solar module dumping causes negligible injury

Published by

PV Magazine

An Australian Government inquiry has found that a number of Chinese PV suppliers are guilty of having dumped modules in the market. However, the anti dumping commission recommended no action be taken due to the relatively small dumping margins and negligible injury or hindrance to the Australian PV industry.

Investigations have shown dumping of modules by some Chinese producers but that they do not warrant countervailing measures.

Findings of solar module dumping practices by some Chinese producers have lead to duties or trade barriers having being put in place in the EU and U.S. Inquiries into dumping in Australia has lead to the finding that dumping has taken place, however no action will be taken.

The Australian Anti-Dumping Commission delivered its finding today. It notes that there is only one module manufacturer currently operating in Australia and that as it supplies AC modules at a high price point, it was not adversely affected by the dumping. It also noted dumping margins ranged from 2.1% to 8.7%, warranting no countervailing measures.

The Commission found that Wuxi Suntech had the largest dumping margin with 8.7%, followed by Trina Solar (4%), Residual Exporters (3.9%), ET Solar (3%) and Renesola (2.1%). Module exports for China were investigated for the period July 2012 through 31 December 2013.

Australia’s only module manufacturer is Tindo Solar, which operates a 60 MW facility in South Australia.

The Commission finds state that while there was evidence of module dumping in the assessed period, “the injury, to the Australian industry or the hindrance, to the Australian industry’s established, caused by PV modules or panels exported to Australia at dumped prices is negligible.”

The factors the Commission took in deciding not to impose countervailing measures were that the size of the dumping margins were not sufficient, that Tindo’s AC product represents “a premium model and priced significantly higher than the imported direct current PV modules,” and that there were not major changes in Australian PV module market during the period.

“The Commission found that injury or hindrance to the establishment of an Australian industry caused by dumped exports is negligible; therefore the Commission has not calculated a non-injurious price…”

The Australian Solar Council (ASC) has welcomed the move, saying that it is “a win for common sense.”

“The Australian Solar Council welcomes this outcome,” said ASC CEO John Grimes. “It is a win for Australian solar PV consumers.”

 

Source: PV Magazine. Reproduced with permission.

Share
Published by
Tags: Trina

Recent Posts

New tax on renewables won’t be retrospective, but will send “opposite message” to foreign investors

Controversial tax changes for foreign renewables investors have dropped one problematic aspect and kept another…

2 July 2026

One in 17 Australian homes now has a solar battery, as rebate installs pass 450,000 at one-year mark

Amid the hype around the launch of the Solar Sharer Offer, federal Labor's flagship consumer…

2 July 2026

State becomes first to ban retail energy “loyalty tax,” in bid to save customers hundreds of dollars a year

State acts where the national rule maker has declined to tread, announcing an Australia-first ban…

2 July 2026

Darwin residents want answers on toxic gas export emissions. Science shows their concerns are warranted

Evidence shows benzene and other gas-related chemicals pose significant health risks. So why is the…

2 July 2026

Electrochemical “bath” could bring spent lithium-ion batteries back to life, cut cost of recycling in half

Researchers believe they have found a way to recover almost the full life of lithium-ion…

2 July 2026

Thin white strips on brown slopes: Manufactured ski seasons are fuelling the climate problem

Ribbons of manufactured snow remind us that national parks should be front-line responses to climate…

2 July 2026