Other Good Stuff

Australia finds solar module dumping causes negligible injury

Published by

PV Magazine

An Australian Government inquiry has found that a number of Chinese PV suppliers are guilty of having dumped modules in the market. However, the anti dumping commission recommended no action be taken due to the relatively small dumping margins and negligible injury or hindrance to the Australian PV industry.

Investigations have shown dumping of modules by some Chinese producers but that they do not warrant countervailing measures.

Findings of solar module dumping practices by some Chinese producers have lead to duties or trade barriers having being put in place in the EU and U.S. Inquiries into dumping in Australia has lead to the finding that dumping has taken place, however no action will be taken.

The Australian Anti-Dumping Commission delivered its finding today. It notes that there is only one module manufacturer currently operating in Australia and that as it supplies AC modules at a high price point, it was not adversely affected by the dumping. It also noted dumping margins ranged from 2.1% to 8.7%, warranting no countervailing measures.

The Commission found that Wuxi Suntech had the largest dumping margin with 8.7%, followed by Trina Solar (4%), Residual Exporters (3.9%), ET Solar (3%) and Renesola (2.1%). Module exports for China were investigated for the period July 2012 through 31 December 2013.

Australia’s only module manufacturer is Tindo Solar, which operates a 60 MW facility in South Australia.

The Commission finds state that while there was evidence of module dumping in the assessed period, “the injury, to the Australian industry or the hindrance, to the Australian industry’s established, caused by PV modules or panels exported to Australia at dumped prices is negligible.”

The factors the Commission took in deciding not to impose countervailing measures were that the size of the dumping margins were not sufficient, that Tindo’s AC product represents “a premium model and priced significantly higher than the imported direct current PV modules,” and that there were not major changes in Australian PV module market during the period.

“The Commission found that injury or hindrance to the establishment of an Australian industry caused by dumped exports is negligible; therefore the Commission has not calculated a non-injurious price…”

The Australian Solar Council (ASC) has welcomed the move, saying that it is “a win for common sense.”

“The Australian Solar Council welcomes this outcome,” said ASC CEO John Grimes. “It is a win for Australian solar PV consumers.”

 

Source: PV Magazine. Reproduced with permission.

Share
Published by
Tags: Trina

Recent Posts

Not a “bunch of yokels”: Armidale mayor lays down “no water, no REZ” demands as region turns dry

City mayor says New England renewable zone depends on state government support for major water…

20 August 2026

Wind and solar investors relieved after Greens and cross-bench win 10-year reprieve on new tax on renewables

Under pressure from all sides, Federal Labor agrees to put more of a buffer between…

20 August 2026

“Trucks, chargers, batteries and green energy:” Fortescue throws AI and data centres into mix in pursuit of real zero

Fortescue settles bill over abandoned electrolyser factory, claims to be biggest builder of solar in…

20 August 2026

Chinese solar inverter executive says tea bag bribe a “cultural thing”, must now leave the country

A Chinese solar energy businessman hid a $20,000 cash bribe in a gift of tea…

20 August 2026

Gas pipeline giant to add another large solar farm and big battery to remote mining region’s power supply

Australia's largest gas pipeline company will build a new off-grid solar and battery project, to…

20 August 2026

“Bikies, criminals, strippers”: Shadow energy minister leaves industry crowd perplexed by speech and gas pledge

Shadow energy minister David Davis took a Gippsland conference crowd on a journey this week,…

20 August 2026