Other Good Stuff

Australia finds solar module dumping causes negligible injury

Published by

PV Magazine

An Australian Government inquiry has found that a number of Chinese PV suppliers are guilty of having dumped modules in the market. However, the anti dumping commission recommended no action be taken due to the relatively small dumping margins and negligible injury or hindrance to the Australian PV industry.

Investigations have shown dumping of modules by some Chinese producers but that they do not warrant countervailing measures.

Findings of solar module dumping practices by some Chinese producers have lead to duties or trade barriers having being put in place in the EU and U.S. Inquiries into dumping in Australia has lead to the finding that dumping has taken place, however no action will be taken.

The Australian Anti-Dumping Commission delivered its finding today. It notes that there is only one module manufacturer currently operating in Australia and that as it supplies AC modules at a high price point, it was not adversely affected by the dumping. It also noted dumping margins ranged from 2.1% to 8.7%, warranting no countervailing measures.

The Commission found that Wuxi Suntech had the largest dumping margin with 8.7%, followed by Trina Solar (4%), Residual Exporters (3.9%), ET Solar (3%) and Renesola (2.1%). Module exports for China were investigated for the period July 2012 through 31 December 2013.

Australia’s only module manufacturer is Tindo Solar, which operates a 60 MW facility in South Australia.

The Commission finds state that while there was evidence of module dumping in the assessed period, “the injury, to the Australian industry or the hindrance, to the Australian industry’s established, caused by PV modules or panels exported to Australia at dumped prices is negligible.”

The factors the Commission took in deciding not to impose countervailing measures were that the size of the dumping margins were not sufficient, that Tindo’s AC product represents “a premium model and priced significantly higher than the imported direct current PV modules,” and that there were not major changes in Australian PV module market during the period.

“The Commission found that injury or hindrance to the establishment of an Australian industry caused by dumped exports is negligible; therefore the Commission has not calculated a non-injurious price…”

The Australian Solar Council (ASC) has welcomed the move, saying that it is “a win for common sense.”

“The Australian Solar Council welcomes this outcome,” said ASC CEO John Grimes. “It is a win for Australian solar PV consumers.”

 

Source: PV Magazine. Reproduced with permission.

Share
Published by
Tags: Trina

Recent Posts

Landmark deal to power “AI factories” underwrites much-needed big battery on Australia’s most renewable grid

Australian "AI factory" developer inks 12-year deal to buy firmed electricity for its data centre…

30 June 2026

“Can’t hire our way out:” Fortescue backs bid to train sparkies, electrify mining

Andrew Forrest's mining company collaborates with two TAFE branches to address a critical shortage of…

30 June 2026

Singapore renewables developer makes billion-dollar boost to Australian solar and battery plans

Singapore-based renewables developer raises more than $1 billion in green financing facilities to support solar…

30 June 2026

State EPA waves through Gina Rinehart’s new gas plant, refers cockatoo question to mining department

State EPA defers native tree clearing decisions to the department of mines for the new…

30 June 2026

HMC unveils new-look energy development arm to advance pipeline of “fully funded” projects

HMC Capital has settled on a name for its growing portfolio of energy assets and…

30 June 2026

Australia’s abundance of renewables can power future industry – but we need it resilient and we need it fast

In a future dominated by renewables, Australia can remain an energy powerhouse. But to be…

30 June 2026