Other Good Stuff

Australia finds solar module dumping causes negligible injury

Published by

PV Magazine

An Australian Government inquiry has found that a number of Chinese PV suppliers are guilty of having dumped modules in the market. However, the anti dumping commission recommended no action be taken due to the relatively small dumping margins and negligible injury or hindrance to the Australian PV industry.

Investigations have shown dumping of modules by some Chinese producers but that they do not warrant countervailing measures.

Findings of solar module dumping practices by some Chinese producers have lead to duties or trade barriers having being put in place in the EU and U.S. Inquiries into dumping in Australia has lead to the finding that dumping has taken place, however no action will be taken.

The Australian Anti-Dumping Commission delivered its finding today. It notes that there is only one module manufacturer currently operating in Australia and that as it supplies AC modules at a high price point, it was not adversely affected by the dumping. It also noted dumping margins ranged from 2.1% to 8.7%, warranting no countervailing measures.

The Commission found that Wuxi Suntech had the largest dumping margin with 8.7%, followed by Trina Solar (4%), Residual Exporters (3.9%), ET Solar (3%) and Renesola (2.1%). Module exports for China were investigated for the period July 2012 through 31 December 2013.

Australia’s only module manufacturer is Tindo Solar, which operates a 60 MW facility in South Australia.

The Commission finds state that while there was evidence of module dumping in the assessed period, “the injury, to the Australian industry or the hindrance, to the Australian industry’s established, caused by PV modules or panels exported to Australia at dumped prices is negligible.”

The factors the Commission took in deciding not to impose countervailing measures were that the size of the dumping margins were not sufficient, that Tindo’s AC product represents “a premium model and priced significantly higher than the imported direct current PV modules,” and that there were not major changes in Australian PV module market during the period.

“The Commission found that injury or hindrance to the establishment of an Australian industry caused by dumped exports is negligible; therefore the Commission has not calculated a non-injurious price…”

The Australian Solar Council (ASC) has welcomed the move, saying that it is “a win for common sense.”

“The Australian Solar Council welcomes this outcome,” said ASC CEO John Grimes. “It is a win for Australian solar PV consumers.”

 

Source: PV Magazine. Reproduced with permission.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Daytime wholesale power prices are heading to zero – isn’t that good news?

A new low proposed for solar feed-in tariffs is bound to spark consumer outrage and…

13 January 2025

Big win for Fortescue as massive 800 MW wind farm gets federal green light

Huge Fortsecue-owned wind farm wins federal environmental approval, subject to conditions, to go ahead as…

13 January 2025

Warradarge wind farm to add another 30 turbines, take lead as ‘state’s largest’

One of Western Australia's largest wind farms is set to become its largest, with the…

13 January 2025

Solar duck sends rooftop feed-in tariff close to zero. Is this the new normal?

Regulator proposes sending state's flat-rate feed-in tariff for rooftop solar to a new low barely…

13 January 2025

Grid Connections 2025: Who’s going where in Australia’s energy transition

People movements at OpenSolar, EV Council, Ørsted, Shell, Pacific Energy, Hydro Tasmania, Vestas and Energy…

12 January 2025

Australia’s biggest coal state breaks new ground in wind and solar output

New South Wales has reached two remarkable renewable energy milestones that signal the growing contribution…

6 January 2025