Categories: CommentaryRenewables

NHMRC pours another $3.3m into wind turbine and health research

Published by

Australia’s National Health and Medical Research Council has sought to justify the allocation of $3.3 million in funding to two new studies into the effects of wind farms on human health, even after more than 20 reviews – including its own research into the subject – have found no “consistent evidence” of a connection.

The NHMRC has awarded UNSW professor Guy Marks $1.94 million, to study the health impacts of infrasound generated by wind turbines, and another $1.36 million to Flinders University’s Peter Catcheside to investigate whether wind farms disturb sleep, compared with traffic noise.

In a statement on Tuesday, NHMRC CEO Anne Kelso said the targeted funding was warranted, due to the poor quality of existing research on the subject.

“These grants directly support the Australian government’s commitment to determine any actual or potential effects of wind farms,” Kelso said.

And committed it has been; the anti-wind efforts of the Abbott government have ranged from its support of endless senate inquiries into the impact of wind energy to the PM’s own admission that his government’s whole strategy since the election had been to reduce, or stop, the building of new “visually awful” wind turbines.

But the call for further “targeted” research has been criticised, with NSW and Victorian health officials last year calling for the NHMRC “to make it clear that the total available evidence (parallel and direct) suggest[s] little health risk,” according to emails seen by Fairfax Media.

Simon Chapman, an emeritus professor of public health at the University of Sydney, told Fairfax that at least 25 reviews internationally had found “very little evidence of direct effects” from wind farms.

Effects that did exist could be put down to psycho-social factors, such as pre-existing antipathy to wind farms, resentment by locals who had received no benefit from turbines in their region, and anxiety of perceived health impacts, Professor Chapman said.

“It’s really quite disgraceful – it’s money literally poured down the drain,” he said.

“There is no health or medical agency in the world that would give any rational priority to wind farms and health.

“Potentially hundreds of researchers who had just missed on funding research would be angry as the money is being spent on wind farm research.”

Sophie Vorrath

Sophie is editor of Renew Economy and editor of its sister site, One Step Off The Grid . She is the co-host of the Solar Insiders Podcast. Sophie has been writing about clean energy for more than a decade.

Recent Posts

Landmark deal to power “AI factories” underwrites much-needed big battery on Australia’s most renewable grid

Australian "AI factory" developer inks 12-year deal to buy firmed electricity for its data centre…

30 June 2026

“Can’t hire our way out:” Fortescue backs bid to train sparkies, electrify mining

Andrew Forrest's mining company collaborates with two TAFE branches to address a critical shortage of…

30 June 2026

Singapore renewables developer makes billion-dollar boost to Australian solar and battery plans

Singapore-based renewables developer raises more than $1 billion in green financing facilities to support solar…

30 June 2026

State EPA waves through Gina Rinehart’s new gas plant, refers cockatoo question to mining department

State EPA defers native tree clearing decisions to the department of mines for the new…

30 June 2026

HMC unveils new-look energy development arm to advance pipeline of “fully funded” projects

HMC Capital has settled on a name for its growing portfolio of energy assets and…

30 June 2026

Australia’s abundance of renewables can power future industry – but we need it resilient and we need it fast

In a future dominated by renewables, Australia can remain an energy powerhouse. But to be…

30 June 2026