South Australia’s energy price hikes: Blame inflated bills, not renewables

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Mainstream media is focusing on soaring energy bills for South Australia businesses, blaming wind and solar. Maybe they should wonder why those businesses agree to be taken to the cleaners when there are cheaper alternatives.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The campaign against renewable energy is in full swing, and particularly so in South Australia. First it was the fear of blackouts and the end of a modern economy, all the fault of wind energy. Now it is soaring electricity costs, with the same culprit.


A typical example came in the Australian Financial Review last week, Electric shock: SA business fears being stuck with high costs for years, which documented how some businesses were paying nearly double the amount for electricity than they had been paying last year. And it was all the fault of renewables.

Apart from wondering how, the AFR might also have wondered why. There is no doubt that fixed contracts set by the retailers have jumped sharply. But why are businesses agreeing to pay them? They are costing those businesses up to 50 per cent more than readily available alternatives.

Michael Williams, from the energy consultancy firm Altus Energy Strategies, is wondering the same thing. In an analysis posted here, Williams points out that companies who did not lock into retail contracts are saving significant amounts of money.

Northern Power Station, Port Augusta

It seems pretty clear that this is a case of a small number of energy retailers using their market power to boost prices beyond where they need to be, just like generators are alleged to do on occasions both in South Australia and Queensland. It is a common complaint in Australia, and one that reflects the market power of a small number of incumbents.

The nominal reason for the big rise in fixed contracts is the imminent closure of the Northern brown coal power generator in Port Augusta, and the assumption that wholesale prices will surge as the local grid depends more on gas and the interconnector to fill in the gaps of wind and solar, which will provide around half the state’s needs.

But Williams questions the market’s pricing. He notes that this is not the first time Northern has withdrawn from service. When it did so before, power prices jumped – but only by around half the 90 per cent price hike indicated in the current futures market.

The rise in wholesale prices when Northern was taken out of service was from around $45/MWh to $70/MWh, broadly equivalent to the now defunct carbon price. The futures market, and retail offerings, are now pricing this at more than $90/MWh.

“A lot of businesses have locked in fixed prices of 9c/kWh. These people have been taken to the cleaners. They’re paying twice what the actual energy price is,” Williams says.

The best alternative, Williams suggests, is to operate what is known as a market pool price pass-through. Williams says this reflects the actual cost of generation, has greater transparency and also usually leads to businesses taking greater interest in their energy consumption, and finding greater efficiencies.

Williams initiated such a program when he was looking after energy consumption at the major cement producer Adelaide Brighton, where he says the company consistently saved $5 million a year, a saving of more than 25 per cent. Ironically, the AFR’s story was based on an interview with Austral Bricks, a major rival, which takes the flat retail offering.

Williams says quite a few businesses with significant energy consumption are exposed to pool pricing – and they have consistently done very well out of it.

sa power prices

This graph shows that only on three days of the first two months of the year – during a hot summer, as well – did the daily average price exceed the flat retail price ($91/MWh) charged by retailers.

“On a very high proportion of the days the average price was at or below 50 per cent of the fixed retail price,” he says.

This resulted in the following pricing pattern:

  • Over the first two months of 2016 the average SA spot price was $45.55/MWh (or 4.6 c/kWh)
  • The average spot price during peak periods was $64.95/MWh (or 6.5 c/kWh).
  • The average spot price during off-peak periods was $33.84/MWh (or 3.4 c/kWh).

Based on this data, a business with, say a flat load of 1MW of average demand, and using pool-pricing pass throughs, would have saved $65,000 – or nearly one-half – on the fixed price offered by retailers. If it used demand management during the one “scary” spike above $5,000/MWh, then the saving would have been $76,000.

Williams says the flat prices have been set so far because the retailers have looked at the worst case scenario and used it as basis for retail pricing.

“The message here is that you have to take action yourself to solve your problems, not wait for somebody else to solve them for you,” Williams says. And as RenewEconomy has noted before, the electricity market is complex, and energy retailer profit from their defacto maxim of “confusion is profit”. But business customers should do better.

There is another point to be made – when prices surge, it is not wind and solar that are pushing them up, but the use of gas and diesel, as Tasmania is finding out to its huge cost at the moment.

And South Australia has a history of surging electricity prices – in fact, prices were more volatile before the introduction of renewables than they are now. Quite what happens now is the subject of much speculation, both on and off the market.

Some suggest a ramping up of the efficient Pelican Point gas generator could moderate prices, others suggest that because the market power will be in the hands of just a few gas fired generators, then the potential for higher prices is greatly increased,

The second point to be made addresses the contention that renewables forced the exit of coal-fired generation. As Williams points out, if a coal-fired generator can not make money when the pool price averages more than $50/MWh, then it probably shouldn’t be in business. Within a couple of months, the Northern power station won’t be.

Williams also suggests businesses should invest in solar – both in rooftop on their premises, and in larger arrays of around 1MW. At a pool price of more than $50/MWh, and strong prices for renewable energy certificates, the payback for such plants could be as low as three years.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

  1. trackdaze 3 years ago

    The truth can get in the way of a perfectly good witch hunt.

  2. aha777 3 years ago

    That’ll be right keeps putting the rates up it’ll only get more people to go off grid with battery storage. They know the battery age is here n trying to rip people off as much as they can before batteries r mainstream.

  3. Paul McArdle 3 years ago

    For those industrial energy users who’d like to learn more about “pool price pass through”, Mike’s articles (and articles from others in the space) are provided on this specially-focused Demand Response website for the Australian energy market:

  4. DevMac 3 years ago

    In regards to this quote:
    “This graph shows that only on three days of the first two months of the year – during a hot summer, as well”
    February was mild, only reaching above 35 for three days in my suburb of Adelaide. The stats for the first week and a half of March would be interesting.

  5. DevMac 3 years ago

    What’s holding business back from implementing solar? I’d have thought the use-case for solar panels would suit businesses better than homes given that the heaviest usage is during daylight hours.

    Even if it was renewables causing prices to go up, wouldn’t it then make sense to invest in solar to provide some insulation against the rising prices?

    Sounds like the kind of businesses that are aggrieved about power prices are too out-dated in their thinking about how to improve their cost efficiencies.

    Have there been any studies into PV penetration into businesses? There seem to be abundant stats on home installs.

    • Pete 3 years ago

      I think many small to medium sized businesses operate from rented premises. It would really be up to the owner to put solar panels on the building. Smart property owners would do that and charge a bit extra on the rent to pay for them. Smart business owners would pay that extra to have a much lower electricity charge.

      • Ian 3 years ago

        Pete, you have identified an interesting barrier to businesses utilising solar. Many rent premises. Most of these businesses would be long term renters. They could buy electricity from the property owner. They could rent rooftop arrays from the owner, or Install their own solar arrays and either remove these once they move or sell them to the building owner. The payback time for solar is only three or 4 years and many arrays fall within the $20 000 tax write-off. Many premises would have parking areas. These would be ideal for temporary solar structures. What is the precedent set by other fixtures used in rented business premises, such as air conditioning plant, kitchen equipment, extractor fans, racking, machines used in manufacturing etc?

        Savvy solar installers should surely research this issue and offer advise to businesses. There must be many ways to wear a sarong.

      • JeffJL 3 years ago

        How many times do you drive around and the For Lease signs say “Will develop to tenants requirements. With the rental market falling tenants could go to their land lords and request solar panels be installed. Rents should rise but the negotiated rise should be less than the savings in electricity. A win/win.

        Why does this not happen. I suggest that business owners are too lazy and it is easier to complain and cut wages.

  6. phred01 3 years ago

    business that can are being pushed into installing solar

  7. Ben Rose 3 years ago

    Hello Giles,
    I presume these are large industrial customers; these are the ones kicking and screaming to keep old coal generation. The pool prices of $40-50 on the NEM grid are unrealistically low, reflecting predominantly old coal plant that has been paid off years ago, in some cases by the tax payer. The fixed costs are therefore a fraction of what they would be with new plant and since the carbon price was abolished they pay nothing for the externalized cost of their pollution. These old coal generators must eventually replaced by new generation
    A recent study by Sustainable Energy Now in WA, which I co-authored and which used the new SIREN (SEN Integrated Renewable Energy Networks) software that we have recently launched, simulated new wind/ solar based renewable energy scenarios together with new ‘business as usual’ coal for WA with a modest $30 carbon price and no RET. The resulting LCOE (assuming all generation in both the RE and BAU scenarios is < 30 years old and still being paid off at commercial discount rate of 10%) is about $125 / MWh for both new coal and wind-solar.

    I am happy to discuss this further with you: email: [email protected]

  8. Jon 3 years ago

    So is the point of this article to suggest that the wholesale price rise in SA has nothing to do with the 1000MW of intermittent renewable generation forcing the closure of hundreds of MWs of dispatchable firm generation, and suggest that it is all one big retailer ripoff? Really!!

  9. Andrew Woodroffe 3 years ago

    $50/MWh is the wholesale price (what the generators get paid), don’t customers pay retail? Which covers, amongst other things, the sticks and wires to get the electricity from the generator to the customer? Note that generation is now considerably less than half of retail.

    If customers are genuinely concerned about their bills, they can become more energy efficient (exceptionally cost effective) and / or generate some electricity themselves – payback periods of 5 years are still so much better than money in the bank. Outside CBDs, people are not short of roof space.

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.