Solar is now most popular form of new electricity generation worldwide | RenewEconomy

Solar is now most popular form of new electricity generation worldwide

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Solar PV outstripped coal as the leading source of new electricity generation worldwide last year.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Conversation

Solar has become the world’s favourite new type of electricity generation, according to global data showing that more solar photovoltaic (PV) capacity is being installed than any other generation technology.

Worldwide, some 73 gigawatts of net new solar PV capacity was installed in 2016. Wind energy came in second place (55GW), with coal relegated to third (52GW), followed by gas (37GW) and hydro (28GW).

new energy build 2016

Together, PV and wind represent 5.5% of current energy generation (as at the end of 2016), but crucially they constituted almost half of all net new generation capacity installed worldwide during last year.

It is probable that construction of new coal power stations will decline, possibly quite rapidly, because PV and wind are now cost-competitive almost everywhere.

Hydro is still important in developing countries that still have rivers to dam. Meanwhile, other low-emission technologies such as nuclear, bio-energy, solar thermal and geothermal have small market shares.

PV and wind now have such large advantages in terms of cost, production scale and supply chains that it is difficult to see any other low-emissions technology challenging them within the next decade or so.

That is certainly the case in Australia, where PV and wind comprise virtually all new generation capacity, and where solar PV capacity is set to reach 12GW by 2020. Wind and solar PV are being installed at a combined rate of about 3GW per year, driven largely by the federal government’s Renewable Energy Target (RET).

This is double to triple the rate of recent years, and a welcome return to growth after several years of subdued activity due to political uncertainty over the RET.

If this rate is maintained, then by 2030 more than half of Australian electricity will come from renewable energy and Australia will have met its pledge under the Paris climate agreement purely through emissions savings within the electricity industry.

To take the idea further, if Australia were to double the current combined PV and wind installation rate to 6GW per year, it would reach 100% renewable electricity in about 2033. Modelling by my research groupsuggests that this would not be difficult, given that these technologies are now cheaper than electricity from new-build coal and gas.

Renewable future in reach

The prescription for an affordable, stable and achievable 100% renewable electricity grid is relatively straightforward:

  1. Use mainly PV and wind. These technologies are cheaper than other low-emission technologies, and Australia has plenty of sunshine and wind, which is why these technologies have already been widely deployed. This means that, compared with other renewables, they have more reliable price projections, and avoid the need for heroic assumptions about the success of more speculative clean energy options.
  2. Distribute generation over a very large area. Spreading wind and PV facilities over wide areas – say a million square kilometres from north Queensland to Tasmania – allows access to a wide range of different weather, and also helps to smooth out peaks in users’ demand.
  3. Build interconnectors. Link up the wide-ranging network of PV and wind with high-voltage power lines of the type already used to move electricity between states.
  4. Add storage. Storage can help match up energy generation with demand patterns. The cheapest option is pumped hydro energy storage (PHES), with support from batteries and demand management.

Australia currently has three PHES systems – Tumut 3, Kangaroo Valley, and Wivenhoe – all of which are on rivers. But there is a vast number of potential off-river sites.

Potential sites for pumped hydro storage in Queensland, alongside development sites for solar PV (yellow) and wind energy (green). Galilee Basin coal prospects are shown in black. Andrew Blakers/Margaret Blakers, Author provided

In a project funded by the Australian Renewable Energy Agency, we have identified about 5,000 sites in South Australia, Queensland, Tasmania, the Canberra district, and the Alice Springs district that are potentially suitable for pumped hydro storage.

Each of these sites has between 7 and 1,000 times the storage potential of the Tesla battery currently being installed to support the South Australian grid. What’s more, pumped hydro has a lifetime of 50 years, compared with 8-15 years for batteries.

Importantly, most of the prospective PHES sites are located near where people live and where new PV and wind farms are being constructed.

Once the search for sites in New South Wales, Victoria and Western Australia is complete, we expect to uncover 70-100 times more PHES energy storage potential than required to support a 100% renewable electricity grid in Australia.

Potential PHES upper reservoir sites east of Port Augusta, South Australia. The lower reservoirs would be at the western foot of the hills (bottom of the image)
Potential PHES upper reservoir sites east of Port Augusta, South Australia. The lower reservoirs would be at the western foot of the hills (bottom of the image)

Managing the grid

Fossil fuel generators currently provide another service to the grid, besides just generating electricity. They help to balance supply and demand, on timescales down to seconds, through the “inertial energy” stored in their heavy spinning generators.

But in the future this service can be performed by similar generators used in pumped hydro systems. And supply and demand can also be matched with the help of fast-response batteries, demand management, and “synthetic inertia” from PV and wind farms.

Wind and PV are delivering ever tougher competition for gas throughout the energy market. The price of large-scale wind and PV in 2016 was A$65-78 per megawatt hour. This is below the current wholesale price of electricity in the National Electricity Market.

Abundant anecdotal evidence suggests that wind and PV energy price has fallen to A$60-70 per MWh this year as the industry takes off. Prices are likely to dip below A$50 per MWh within a few years, to match current international benchmark prices.

Thus, the net cost of moving to a 100% renewable electricity system over the next 15 years is zero compared with continuing to build and maintain facilities for the current fossil-fuelled system.

Gas can no longer compete with wind and PV for delivery of electricity. Electric heat pumps are driving gas out of water and space heating. Even for delivery of high-temperature heat for industry, gas must cost less than A$10 per gigajoule to compete with electric furnaces powered by wind and PV power costing A$50 per MWh.

Importantly, the more that low-cost PV and wind is deployed in the current high-cost electricity environment, the more they will reduce prices.

Then there is the issue of other types of energy use besides electricity – such as transport, heating, and industry. The cheapest way to make these energy sources green is to electrify virtually everything, and then plug them into an electricity grid powered by renewables.

A 55% reduction in Australian greenhouse gas emissions can be achieved by conversion of the electricity grid to renewables, together with mass adoption of electric vehicles for land transport and electric heat pumps for heating and cooling.

Beyond this, we can develop renewable electric-driven pathways to manufacture hydrocarbon-based fuels and chemicals, primarily through electrolysis of water to obtain hydrogen and carbon capture from the atmosphere, to achieve an 83% reduction in emissions (with the residual 17% of emissions coming mainly from agriculture and land clearing).

Doing all of this would mean tripling the amount of electricity we produce, according to my research group’s preliminary estimate.

But there is no shortage of solar and wind energy to achieve this, and prices are rapidly falling. We can build a clean energy future at modest cost if we want to.

Source: The Conversation. Reproduced with permission.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

  1. Tim Forcey 3 years ago

    Hey, thanks for the link to the heat pump article in The Conversation Andrew! Yesterday I was explaining heat pumps and their impact on gas demand to the Scientific Inquiry into Hydraulic Fracturing in the Northern Territory. Guardian article here:

    • juxx0r 3 years ago

      Did you explain how they needed to halve in price and double their warranty period before they become viable?

      I want to buy one right now, and i keep coming back to LPG instantaneous.

      Wish i could go with the heat pump but 🙁

      • Tim Forcey 3 years ago

        There are heat pumps for heating water, and heat pumps for heating your house. And heat pumps to dry your clothes, heat your pool/spa… There is a recent story of one single heat pump in the UK to heat 350 homes. And heat pumps to heat “industrial-agricultural” greenhouses. And so on. See our discussions at My Efficient Electric Home.

      • Tim Forcey 3 years ago

        Re heat pumps for hot water, some of our Members at My Efficient Electric Home had them installed for $0. The cost was covered by renewable energy certificates etc. Yes, if you use very little hot water (only 1 or 2 people in the home, great showerhead, wash clothes mostly in cold water) then your hot water costs will be very small to begin with and you might want to spend your dollars and “green” dollars elsewhere – more solar PV, electric car, etc etc…

        • juxx0r 3 years ago

          Thanks Tim, I’m having another look at it. To be fair had only looked at the generic ones with COP of 3. Dont know how you get a $4k unit for free though.

          Am off grid, so every kWh is critical in winter.

          • solarguy 3 years ago

            So don’t get a HW heat pump, but of course you won’t, because your not stupid.

            What do you use for heating water?

          • juxx0r 3 years ago

            instantaneous lpg.

  2. Tim Forcey 3 years ago

    And well done Andrew re all this Pumped Hydro progress.

  3. solarguy 3 years ago

    Andrew I agree with what you have said here and before. Now heat pumps are good for heating and cooling air, but they come up a little short on heating water for being cost effective over a year. 2016 I used grid power to boost my E.T. Solar Hot Water System, only 8 days of the year using no more than 7.2kwh each time and a few times only 3.6kwh. And yes I know if one was to have extra PV a heat pump could be run free too, but only some of the time and it would still run 2nd to E.T. SHW.

    Don’t you agree Tim! LOL

  4. Ian 3 years ago

    Aargh, who the hell is still building coal power stations? 52 GW of this . They need to be named and shamed! Also the nuclear thing . These are not low emissions, they’re just different emissions and potentially far more devastating than carbon dioxide ask the Japanese, Ukrainians and Belorussians!

    • Chris Ford 3 years ago

      Floating solar farm on the dam could reduce evaporation, and provide some recharge pumping power during the day?

    • lin 3 years ago

      “What is the water cost of off river pumped hydro?”
      You can use seawater for your pumped hydro if you select an appropriate coastal location (of which there are many).

      • Ian 3 years ago

        If every person in Australia stood on the coastline arms width apart, the line would circumnavigate this country. The nice green bits are on the coastline to 10 to 30 km inland. The rest is not so good. We really don’t have coastline to waste on things like seawater lakes on the top of our scarce mountain scenery;(

        • lin 3 years ago

          I take it from your comment that you have never driven from Adelaide to Perth.

          • Ian 3 years ago

            Oh, I just googled the coastline of Australia 25 000km number of people 25 million . People spaced evenly apart 1m between each. As you say, a lot of it is remote and maybe not so desirable, but that’s the point isn’t it, our coastal areas make this country. There’s a very good reason why our population is 25 million vs USA 325 million, most of it is not very pleasant to live in, why screw up the best bits with infrastructure and salt water dams?

          • GregS 3 years ago

            So by “screw up the best bits with infrastructure and dams” surely you also meant roads and houses and industry. In fact to stretch your point even further, why screw up the best bits with humans at all. You should all live in the interior and only be allowed to visit the best bits if you’re nice to the environment the rest of the year 🙂

        • GregS 3 years ago

          Maybe because that’s where the wind is? Also the rain tends to be where the green bits are (hence, why they are green) and along with rainfall goes hydro and pumped storage. Granted the interior would be good for massive solar farms.

    • trackdaze 3 years ago

      This excludes the amount of coal plant retirements which may actually have coal going backwards

  5. Umbrella Man 3 years ago

    Wonder what it would cost without subsidies?

    • trackdaze 3 years ago

      Less than all other subsidised energy forms.

  6. heinbloed 3 years ago

    Thanks for the summary!

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.