BHP sees 500MW solar and storage potential in disused mines | RenewEconomy

BHP sees 500MW solar and storage potential in disused mines

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

BHP has been told its legacy mines in north America could support more than 500MW of solar, wind and storage, turning liabilities into potential assets.

Leigh Creek open cut mine when it was operational.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Peak Downs/Saraji open cut coal mine in Queensland. This scar on the Earth is 50 kilometres long and clearly the rehab bill for this is well into the billions (Image via Flikr)

Australian mining giant BHP has identified legacy mine sites in the US alone that could provide more than 500MW of wind, solar and storage capacity, as part of a review that could see a global push into renewable energy technologies.

The study of BHP’s north American assets was conducted by the US-based renewable energy think tank, the Rocky Mountain Institute, as part of its “Sunshine for Mines” research project.

The program suggests that disused mines could be an ideal site for placing large-scale solar, or wind projects, as well as storage, and BHP had engaged RMI to look at its north American portfolio of legacy sites for renewable development.

“Using the methodology, RMI identified significant potential for redevelopment and a clear subset of sites with a collective potential of over 0.5 GW,” RMI says in its report.

“For most of the sites, because of their location, solar PV emerged as the largest opportunity, with a few being well suited for wind development.

“Various storage technologies were also explored and, in some cases, recommended. The opportunities in the subset were ranked by overall value according to the variables assessed via the scorecard system. This helped BHP prioritize activities and take action on the most attractive opportunities.”

RenewEconomy contacted BHP for further comment, but did not get a reply before publication.

The use of old mine sites for renewable energy and storage projects is not new, although it is only just taking off.

In Queensland, Genex proposes a large solar farm and pumped hydro storage in the old Kidston gold mine, and in Victoria Nectar Farms is proposing a significant battery storage array, along with a  neighbouring wind farm, om the old Stawell gold mine.

And in South Australia, Liberty OneSteel, the new owners of the Whyalla steel works, is looking at a pumped hydro installation in a disused iron ore mine as part of its 1GW investment in solar, storage and demand management to turn its operations green with energy.

BHP is also keeping a close eye on solar and storage, entering into a partnership for the development of the Lakeland solar and storage – the first instance where the two technologies are couple on the grid in Australia – which is due to come on line soon.

BHP has also been mulling opportunities for using solar and storage at its remote operating mine sites as an alternative to diesel or gas, following on the success of its rivals in projects such as Weipa in north Queensland and the Sandfire copper mine in West Australia.

“We want to identify the technologies that have the opportunity to materially lower emissions,’’ Fiona Wild, BHP’s head of sustainability and climate change told Bloomberg last year. “We are looking at batteries in a fringe-of-grid location and a lot of our locations fall into that category.’’

The RMI study said legacy mine sites are uniquely positioned for second lives through renewable energy development.

That’s because most medium-sized closed sites can require a staff of 5–10 people for maintenance and cost several millions of dollars a year to maintain. Might as well build a solar plant, or a wind farm, to generate some revenue to support that.

It said mine sites, once no longer producing, often became liabilities, and revenue options were limited.

“Lack of awareness surrounding the possibilities of renewables and storage development on legacy mine sites may lead to the belief that renewables are not profitable in the long run,” the report said.

“The reality, though, is that innovative renewable energy and storage solutions can establish a sustainable revenue stream, transforming legacy sites from liabilities into assets.”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

  1. Bill Holliday 3 years ago

    Old mine sites would already have a connection to the grid.

    • Megs 3 years ago

      Andin many cases they have the plumbing to pump water up out of the mine.

    • Trent Deverell 3 years ago

      Indeed 66kv and good for 60-100MW…..

  2. bedlambay 3 years ago

    There are many kms open cut mines in Qld abandoned which should be looked at for renewables and pumped hydro. One of Joh’s many shameful acts was to allow giant holes in the ground with virtually no rehabilitation. The Qld govt could leverage off renewables to start rehab.

    • john 3 years ago

      What has happened is that mines have sold the sites for $1 and passed on the cost of fixing up the damage to the $1 company.
      Yes that $1 company will fix up the damage of course.
      The new company has a capital value of $1 so of course they can fix up any problems.

      • Michael Murray 3 years ago

        Are open cuts deep enough to make this work ? I assume what is important is the change in potential energy of the water moving from the top to the bottom ?

        • Trent Deverell 3 years ago

          Consider the adage of old-school engine tuning…. “Flow makes it go”

          …. as for LP hydro, it just involves bigger pipes to increase the flow(volume) and a turbine suited to being spun up with lower pressure…

        • Steve Woots 3 years ago

          need 800M for pumped hydro, so I’d say no for most open cuts. However if they are flat-ish then better for huge solar PV.
          And, wind would be site by site, if the resource was good enough

    • Pixilico 3 years ago

      Yes, there are plenty of opportunities just lying out there waiting to be plucked:

  3. Steve Woots 3 years ago

    Rehab would normally need:
    1. Treating chemical / toxic nasties – if present?
    2. Earthworks – could never fill in the hole, but ‘smoothing’ it to some degree.
    3. revegetation
    4. anything else?

    2. could be easier with electric machinery – doing the work in stages, using the electricity they produce on site – any maybe autonomous to some degree.
    And the cost could be considered site preparation – just an accounting trick, but that might make a difference.

    3. Nature often does a bit of this over time. Re-use of the site kicks this can down the road a bit, also, would reduce the need.

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.