Abbott to miss UN climate summit in New York – by one day

Tony Abbott has once again nailed his colours to the mast on climate change, confirming that he would not be attending a major United Nations climate summit in New York next Tuesday, despite the fact he was arriving there for a UN Security Council meeting just one day later.

The climate summit, hosted by UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, is considered to be an important precursor to the meeting in Paris next year, at which UN leaders hope to carve out an international agreement to limit climate change.

Abbott, who has, in his own words, “used some colourful language describing the so-called settled science of climate change” in the past, told ABC Radio he would not be joining 125 other world leaders – including US President Barack Obama and UK PM David Cameron – at the summit, because he had important business in parliament.

“My first duty in a sense is to the Australian parliament and that’s where I’ll be early in the week,” he said on Tuesday. “There are quite a lot of things happening in the Australian parliament in the next week or so.”

But Abbott, who will send foreign minister Julie Bishop to the climate summit in his stead, will arrive in New York just one day after the event, having found time in his schedule to participate in UN talks on Iraq and terrorism.

220px-Connie_Hedegaard,_Danmarks_miljominister_och_nordisk_samarbetsminister
EU climate chief Connie Hedegaard

It’s a decision that has surprised and, clearly, disappointed EU climate chief Connie Hedegarrd, who told ABC Radio National it was “a pity” that not every head of state was going to attend.

“The sad fact is, climate change is worsening, almost by the day,” Hedegaard said in an interview aired on ABC RN’s morning program. But she stressed that there were “125 concerned heads of state” who had sent a strong signal to the rest of the world, that “they know they have a role to play and a responsibility to take in order for the world to address climate change.”

When asked if she thought Abbott’s decision not to attend reflected his attitude to climate change, Hedegaard said she didn’t know what his reasons were, but that the world would interpret “who is showing up and who will not be showing up.”

“That’s for your prime minister and your government to decide,” she said, “what kind of profile they want in this.”

Of course, Abbott is not alone in not attending. China’s president Xi Jinping (Vice Premier Zhang Gaoli will represent China at the summit) and India’s prime minister Narenda Modi are also absenting themselves from the talks, as is Abbott’s ideological doppelganger, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

Unlike Abbott, Harper hasn’t given any indication as to why he isn’t personally attending the conference (Canada’s environment minister will be there). But like Abbott, the Canadian PM will arrive in New York just after it – in Harper’s case to attend the UN’s Every Woman, Every Child event on September 25.

As for China and India, UN climate chief Christiana Figueres has said that people shouldn’t read too much into the fact that their heads of state aren’t personally attending.

“The fact is that they had fully intended to be represented at the top level and for reasons that have nothing to do with the climate summit at the at the last minute they are not able to be there,” she said.

India’s Modi will being travelling to the US shortly after the summit to meet with Obama, and India has said the leaders expect to speak about climate change.

And Hedegaard – who just returned from a trip to India – says she is expecting a strong commitment to climate change action from the new Modi government. “The environment minister of India will be going there,” she said.

“I hope we will hear a strong commitment from the new government that they will try and be ready to tell the rest of the world what they’re planning to do first quarter next year, and I think the same is the case for China.”

In Canada, reports are that some are disappointed with Harper’s decision not to attend, and learn more about climate solutions.

“Ever since Stephen Harper became Prime Minister, Canada’s position at UN climate conferences has been to undermine discussions, block progress and sabotage negotiations,” Canada’s Green Party leader Elizabeth May told Yahoo Canada. “That’s why we’ve received more Fossil of the Day awards than any other country,” she said.

Comments

12 responses to “Abbott to miss UN climate summit in New York – by one day”

  1. Keith Avatar
    Keith

    Australia won’t be able to duck the action in Paris next year.

    The current situation in Iraq and Syria involves but one of many trouble spots around the world, but none of these threatens the existence of humanity in the way that the climate issues do.

    Probably helpful that Abbott won’t be there as he would only attend to disrupt.

  2. Warwick Avatar
    Warwick

    They should say “head of government” not “head of state”, otherwise Abbott would be most pleased that Queen Elizabeth II could attend representing Australia, UK, Canada and more than a dozen other independent countries…

    1. Peter Trevena Avatar
      Peter Trevena

      Climate change is a load of BS! Earth has cooled and warmed since God created it!

      1. Petra Liverani Avatar
        Petra Liverani

        Is there a person on the planet who has an argument with that statement, least of all climate scientists who know far more about historical changes than we do? It always bewilders me how anyone can think that that statement is in any sense an argument against anthropogenic climate change. Logic 101: because something has always happened due to a particular cause does not logically preclude something else causing it.

  3. john Avatar
    john

    we will send foreign minister Julie Bishop because this discussion is so “{ foreign }” to Australians. We do not now do Science down here we read the good book and its all a big scheme you have to understand.
    We get the good information from the shock jocks you know rather like fox news.
    Yes I know pitiful but that is how it is

  4. Pedro Avatar
    Pedro

    Abbott has nothing positive to contribute anyway. Better that he doesnt attend

  5. Chris Fraser Avatar
    Chris Fraser

    He should go on time as paid entertainment

  6. Macabre Avatar
    Macabre

    Paris 2015 is the first real opportunity post the failure of Copenhagen 2009 – to determine a real and meaningful climate change mitigation path. I suspect leaders have been very strongly encouraged to attend, but equally told not to attend unless they can bring a serious and positive commitment to working actively to solve this issue. If so, this would explain the list of those heads of government not attending.

    Australia’s involvement was only important when the US was not involved. Now that it is, Australia is irrelevant – as we always do what the US asks. China is the only notable absentee – which (if I am trying to be positive about this) I suspect is because of their internal decision making processes, but they show every sign of wanting to be a leader here – and to avoid the embarrassment they suffered in 2009.

  7. Rob G Avatar
    Rob G

    Further embarrassment for Australia. Abbott must be close to being the most disliked politician in the world today. Everywhere he goes the first question he always asked is “do you believe in climate change?”. What a reputation!

  8. EllisWyatt Avatar
    EllisWyatt

    Germany, China, India, Canada, Australia and the list is growing. The brats are losing, despite their incessant whining.

  9. CoreyAnder Avatar
    CoreyAnder

    It seems clear that Abbott hates his daughters. He cares not a jot for their future. If only he had a son.

  10. Jason Avatar
    Jason

    Climate change and peak oil are linked to terrorism in the fact that the economy is tied to oil and growth to maintain its prosperity and it will take decades of full scale action on renewables to get the developed world to a point where we can leave the middle east alone. 60% of the known light sweet crude is in the middle east and our economies are absolutely dependant upon this one critical resource… Australia is so bad at understanding this that it doesn’t have a 90 day supply of oil stored in Australia.

    This is from the IEA in 2011:

    Until 2000, the year in which its domestic crude production peaked, Australia was either a net oil exporter or relied only marginally on oil imports to meet domestic demand. As such, Australia had little to no stockholding requirement towards the IEA. Since 2000, declining domestic oil production coupled with oil demand growth has resulted in a steady rise in net imports, and thus the amount of oil stocks necessary to meet Australia’s IEA obligation. Beginning in 2010, the level of oil stocks in Australia have failed to cover 90 days of net imports.

    A National Energy Security Assessment conducted by the Australian government in 2011 will evaluate the country’s current energy security situation and help inform Australia’s consideration of stockholding compliance options.

    The Australian emergency policy is to rely on the domestic market to respond to supply shortfalls in the first instance, including consumer response to price signals. Short-term surge production capacity and fuel switching capacity in Australia is limited. In a declared state of emergency, the Australian government has legislative powers to control the storage, transfer, sale and production of liquid fuels. Initial light-handed demand restraint measures and a rationing scheme at the wholesaler level can quickly be escalated to invoke heavier-handed measures including retail rationing. Australia’s State and Territory Governments have constitutional powers for planning and coordinating emergency response within their territorial boundaries. In the case of a major oil crisis, affecting more than one jurisdiction, Ministers have agreed that the National Oil Supplies Emergency Committee (NOSEC), which includes the fuel industry, will advise on appropriate actions. In an IEA collective action, NOSEC would likely recommend initial participation with the use of demand restraint measures.

    It is time to see fossil fuels as a major security risk for the continued prosperity of the general community. The constant war and instability in the middle east where the majority of the light sweet crude that is easy to pump is a mess of sectarian violence and it would be extremely unwise to continue to put our future within arms reach of these insane groups….

    Climate change and national security have to be addressed with massive investment into renewables and research into new technologies and methodologies to systematically understand our vulnerability and look for exciting new opportunities to develop entire new technologies and business models that result in securing our future in Australia while doing our part to secure our future on this planet…

    We really need to stop asking politely and start demanding urgent action in a systematic and methodical manner…

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.