Victorian Coalition backs gas fracking ban – but not rooftop solar

Victoria will become the first Australian state to permanently ban unconventional onshore gas mining after the Opposition agreed to support the legislation introduced into Parliament by the Andrews government late last year.

Victoria’s Coalition confirmed on Wednesday that the legislation to ban fracking – and to extend a moratorium on conventional gas mining – would pass through Parliament with its support; a move that puts the party in lock-step with public sentiment on the issue (polling shows only 9.7 per cent of Victorians are opposed to the ban), and notably out of step with its federal counterpart.

csg-bentley-blockage-live-byron-16

Liberal party sources cited in the Murdoch papers said the ­Coalition had decided not to fight Labor on the matter because it was in line with a position taken by Opposition Leader Matthew Guy and Nationals leader Peter Walsh in 2015.

The issue is a particularly tricky one for National Party members, whose major constituency – Australian farmers – is one of the biggest opponents to CSG mining, due to the risks it poses to prime farm land and water resources.

“I would want to make sure that you’re not completely devastating a whole agricultural industry on the sake of potentially exploring for gas in areas that we traditionally haven’t been before,” said Victorian Farmers Federation President David Jochinke.

The timing of the bill’s passage, however, is not great for the federal Coalition, which has recently laid down the gauntlet on energy policy, lambasting state governments over their ambitious renewable energy targets, and backing both gas and new coal as key ingredients of Australia’s “clean” energy future.

“They have locked up all the gas,” Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull fumed on Wednesday in response to the news. “The Victorian government will not even allow the exploration of onshore conventional gas in Victoria.

“You have massive gas resources in Victoria and you have ­people crying out for the energy.”

Federal energy minister Josh Frydenberg said that the Victorian government’s heavy-handed approach was in­appropriate.

“More gas means more jobs and more investment,” he said. “Rather than pursuing statewide moratoriums and bans on conventional and unconventional gas exploration, the best way forward is a case-by-case ­approach that allows you to take into account relevant environmental and economic factors.”

Not surprisingly, some energy industry representatives were also displeased by the outcome.

Australian Energy Council chief executive Matthew Warren – who in an op-ed for the AFR on Wednesday said “put simply, you cannot finance coal” – said the gas ban pandered to populist sentiment and was bad news for the integration of renewables.

“This change is disappointing and will mean bad news for energy prices and gas supply into the ­future,” he said. “Shorting gas supply will make it harder to deliver the state government’s renewable energy ambitions.’’

Australian Petroleum Production & Exploration Association chief executive Malcolm Roberts said the bill was an overreaction.

“There has been a fear campaign around fracking and the ­activists have been very successful in creating uncertainty in people’s minds,” he said. “The politicians have responded to that by overreacting.’’

But state Labor’s minister for resources, Wade Noonan, says his government has done the right thing.

“Victorians have resoundingly rejected fracking, and we’re putting an end to it,” he said. “It threatens the reputation of our vital agricultural sector and puts the state’s world-class food producers and regional economies at risk.”

Meanwhile, Victorian energy and climate minister, Lily D’Ambrosio, is keen to point out that her opposite number have not completely abandoned the federal party line, having chosen to vote against the Andrew’s government’s bill proposing a fairer feed-in tariff.

Comments

14 responses to “Victorian Coalition backs gas fracking ban – but not rooftop solar”

  1. Tim Forcey Avatar
    Tim Forcey

    The Victorian Government has realised that for many people, the cheapest way to heat your home in winter is with a reverse-cycle air con (aka heat pump), not with gas.

    See: http://switchon.vic.gov.au/more-ways-to-save/visit-our-interactive-energy-efficient-house/Interactive-energy-efficient-house

    1. MrMauricio Avatar
      MrMauricio

      the people have!!!!

    2. Brunel Avatar
      Brunel

      How come new houses are still being built with ducted gas heating then?

      They should ban 90% of new houses from installing ducted gas heating.

      1. Tim Forcey Avatar
        Tim Forcey

        The only thing that has been banned, as far as I am aware, is allowing gas equipment vendors to say things like “ducted gas is the cheapest way to heat your home”, because that is not true anymore. See: http://www.ata.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/20151222-Vic-Preso.pdf

        1. Brunel Avatar
          Brunel

          Good presentation mate.

          Although I feel calling heat pumps “renewable energy” is confusing and unnecessary.

          Especially when ABC journalists do not know the difference between a kW and a kWh.

          Cheap and simple electric heaters that are just toasters should come with a half-star efficiency rating while air conditioners get 3 stars or more – then a lot of people will switch to heat pumps.

          There are a lot of ignorant people out there.

          As for vendors, they may have stopped saying it to firms like Delfin, but Delfin can keep installing gas heating in new houses. (Delfin is a developer).

          1. Tim Forcey Avatar
            Tim Forcey

            Some people are attracted to renewable energy and when they learn that heat pumps (e.g. reverse-cycle air cons) harvest free renewable ambient heat, they become attracted to heat pumps.

            Yes, one thing I want to add to that preso is a star rating for resistive electric heaters and I think it would be MINUS 5 stars. (If every star is meant to be a 10 to 15% change in energy use.)

            Have you joined us at My Efficient Electric Home on facebook? 820 members there now. See: https://theconversation.com/can-facebook-help-you-make-your-home-more-sustainable-70588

          2. Brunel Avatar
            Brunel

            What colour would the minus stars be?

            On Google Play Store, one can not give a minus star rating – just a 1 star rating.

            I guess the most efficient heater should be given a 5 star rating and the least efficient heater (toaster) should be given a half star rating.

            Every other air con should be between 1 star and 4.5 stars. That would be fair.

          3. Tim Forcey Avatar
            Tim Forcey

            Yeah the thing is the star rating system is based around every star being a 10 to 15% change in energy use. And at the moment there is a 7 star reverse-cycle air con (heat pump): the small output Daikin US7. If the two very different beasts i). resistive electric heaters and ii). renewable-ambient-heat-harvesting heat pumps go on the same scale (why not just for the fun of it) the the scale is minus 5 to that 7. Dunno if we will ever see an 8 star reverse-cycle air con. One source out of Japan suggests not.

  2. Malcolm M Avatar
    Malcolm M

    I’m not yet convinced there is much resource being locked up. In Western Victoria, for example, there is a coal seam about 1 m thick and 1 km down, which would be the target for unconventional gas extraction. Whereas in the Cooper Basin the coal seam is 80-100 m thick and has flow rates well in excess of many similar developments in the US. Yet even in the Cooper Basin the gas industry appear to be slow to develop the resource.

    In NSW the gas industry invested a lot of money in unconventional gas exploration and found a few fields so small that it was hardly worth the trouble.

    1. Tim Forcey Avatar
      Tim Forcey

      Yes, it was only ever some small players pushing unconventional gas extraction in Victoria. There are shales for sure, in addition to coal seams… Shale gas is the bigger item, for example, in the USA. Slow to develop unconventional gas in the Cooper Basin? Well, it is not cheap to develop, that is for sure. That tends to slow people down.

  3. Chris Fraser Avatar
    Chris Fraser

    Vic’s solar resource is free – and cheaper to convert to electricity.

  4. Greg Hudson Avatar
    Greg Hudson

    ”Turdbull: you have ­people crying out for the energy’ he’s right you know, but it’s RENEWABLE ENERGY we want, not fracking (the Battle Star Galactica type) gas from farmland.

    1. Greg Hudson Avatar
      Greg Hudson

      I’ve just sold my house (and lost my solar with PFIT), and the new (brand new house) has a 14kw reverse cycle ducted aircon as its only heating/cooling (and no solar – yet). I’m dreading what the power bill is going to be like, compared to by total bill for 2016 of just $414 (mostly fixed fees). I can almost feel the hair being ripped out of my head, and I have not even moved in yet !

      1. Tim Forcey Avatar
        Tim Forcey

        People can check out the Facebook group My Efficient Electric Home for assistance in these situations.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.