Data: Collapse of coal power projects sparks climate hope

Energy Desk

OBERHAUSEN, GERMANY - JANUARY 06: Steam and exhaust rise from the power plant of STEAG on a cold winter day on January 6, 2017 in Oberhausen, Germany. According to a report released by the European Copernicus Climate Change Service, 2016 is likely to have been the hottest year since global temperatures were recorded in the 19th century. According to the report the average global surface temperature was 14.8 degrees Celsius, which is 1.3 degrees higher than estimates for before the Industrial Revolution. Greenhouse gases are among the chief causes of global warming and climates change. (Photo by Lukas Schulze/Getty Images)
(Photo by Lukas Schulze/Getty Images)

Cancellation and retirement of coal power plants in the world’s four key economies is making a profound impact on global efforts to limit climate change to 2C — thereby staving off its most catastrophic consequences.

The amount of coal power in development globally was cut in half last year — down to 570GW from 1090GW one year earlier.

Much of that culled planned capacity came from China and India, where the boom years have given way to green energy growth, an oversupply crisis and extreme air pollution. Meanwhile, a record amount of coal-fired capacity was retired in the past two years, led by U.S. and UK.

According to the latest Boom & Bust report from Greenpeace, Sierra Club and CoalSwarm, 2016 saw monumental drops in every stage of coal project development.

Pre-construction activity fell by 48%, construction starts by 62% and ongoing construction by 19%.

The scale of this turnaround, unthinkable just a few years ago, suggests that the long-held aim of stopping global warming before it surpasses the 2C threshold may be achieved.

For that to happen, however, the coal power pipeline would have to shrink further and faster, while retirements are brought forward.

coalclimategraph-2

China

Last year, China’s story was a historic crackdown on its bloated coal power and industrial sectors — blocking approvalscapping new capacity and even scrapping projects already-under construction.

At the beginning of the year, Energydesk broke news that China had suspended more than 100 coal projects in development.

More recently we reported that approvals for coal power projects fell by 85% in 2016 vs the year before.

It’s events like that which created the conditions that could trigger a global phaseout of the most carbon-intensive fossil fuel.

rsz_screen_shot_2017-03-22_at_25529_pm

India

Right alongside China is India, the world’s other major emerging economy, which has tripled its coal capacity since 2007.

Together the countries accounted for 86% of new coal power around the world over the past 10 years.

And together they are facing a critical crossroads: stick with coal, which has boosted growth at the expense the public’s health and the environment, or bet big on alternatives including solar, nuclear and gas.

India, like China, is in some ways having that decision made for it.

Utilization of existing coal plants is falling dramatically, thanks to overbuilding and “massive expansion of renewables, conservation of energy because of efficiency
measures”, according to the country’s Power Minister. As a result, the ministry already said last year that the country already has more than enough coal projects for the next few years.

That statement was compounded by the government’s National Energy Plan, which concluded India required no further coal power capacity (beyond that under construction) for the next decade.

The money is drying up, and work at 13 spots – with 13GW of potential power – has been put on hold.

Rest of the world

Even as President Donald Trump talks about saving the U.S. coal industry, five more coal-fired power plants have decided to retire during the first two months of his presidency, bringing the total to 251 plants, or 32% of total coal-fired capacity, since 2010. Europe is following slowly but surely, with Belgium and Scotland becoming coal-free and three other EU countries setting phase-out dates last year. The biggest outstanding coal concern is what’s happening in Southeast Asia.

Earlier this year a Greenpeace-Harvard report detailed the health impacts of the 400 coal plants planned in the region.

While India’s ambitious renewable energy programme has already enabled wind and solar plants bid lower electricity prices than new coal, without subsidies, most of Southeast Asia has not gotten over the initial hump in developing its renewable energy industry. This makes coal seem like a competitive solution, despite the severe toll on health and environment.

For the globe’s climate goals to be achieved, something has to happen there.

Read the full report here

Source: Energy Desk. Reproduced with permission.

Comments

7 responses to “Data: Collapse of coal power projects sparks climate hope”

  1. Brunel Avatar
    Brunel

    It would be good to get actual numbers.

    How many GW of coal did China retire in 2016 and how many GW of coal did China add in 2016.

    Ditto India.

    1. Mike Dill Avatar
      Mike Dill

      Part of the problem in getting those numbers is that many coal plants in China and India are not officially retired, but are run for many fewer hours. The ‘capacity factor’ (or hours of operation) for those coal plants is decreasing, but retiring them would cause the employees to be laid off, and the plants to become stranded assets.

  2. john Avatar
    john

    I can make a bet this does not become published anywhere else but here and a few other online sites.
    Just today the local leader of council was using the line “bringing cheap affordable power to India”, which was not questioned at all by the interviewer.
    How long before the light bulb is turned on by our political leaders who just may get an education about just what is happening in most of the world?

    1. Brunel Avatar
      Brunel

      A bigger concern is the LNP’s desire to build a coal power station in AUS.

  3. Shane White Avatar
    Shane White

    How many times do I have to state this? 2C is not safe. Google: hansen 2C, look at what’s happened to the Great Barrier Reef thus far at 1C warming (if El Nino is excluded) and that’s the largest living structure on earth. The Arctic and Antarctic sea ice are both at record minimums; the Arctic at a record low-peak for the 3rd year in a row. C’mon Renew, this isn’t 2000 – the world has moved on from thinking that limiting warming to 2C is some sort of goal (and chances were only 66% anyhow…)

    There is some good news for investing in coal: http://www.globalconstructionreview.com/markets/japan-plans-dash-co7al-43-statio7ns-12-yea7rs/

    And who supplies the investment money?
    https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/swept-under-rug-coal-financing-report.pdf
    Those same people pledging emission reductions in Paris of course.

  4. Shane White Avatar
    Shane White

    Table 1 of the report:
    In Jan 2016 there was 338 GW of coal power in construction.
    In Jan this year 273 GW.
    Think I’ll put off popping the cork of the bubbly. Gawd. For how long will they be operating?

    1. Shane White Avatar
      Shane White

      Table 3 shows there’s 2,000 GW of coal power operating. That’s 2 terra Watts. That
      B
      L
      O
      W
      S
      my mind.

      And another 843 GW in Active Development. That’s an expected increase of 843/2000 = 42%.

      What were we celebrating again?

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.