6 potential US grid-scale energy storage projects

CleanTechnica

One of the most obvious themes of the renewable energy growth phase the world is in right now is uncertainty. There seems to be a lot of confusion about the costs of solar and wind power vs. fossil-fuel-based and nuclear-generated electricity. That solar power costs have dropped dramatically in the last six years does not seem to have sunk in completely with the public. At the same time, there are still a number of interested parties that actively oppose renewable energy.

They create seeds of doubt about renewables, explained a lobbyist that works with oil and gas companies.“You get in people’s mind a tie. They don’t know who is right. And you get all ties because the tie basically insures the status quo. Fear and anger have to be part of this campaign. If you want to win, that’s what we’re going to do.”

lipabnl-570x284

Now, let’s include energy storage in the mix to add to the confusion. It would be great if we could all get solar panels on our homes and large, cheap batteries as well, in order to store the electricity they generated. It’s true that more and more homeowners are getting solar panels, but large, cheap home energy systems don’t exist yet. It does appear that they will be coming, however.

One point of clarity, though, in this period of transition seems to be that some institutions are investigating grid-scale energy storage systems. These are big systems with megawatt+ capacities. They are being looked into by organizations that have tended to be conservative, so this activity suggests that energy storage is getting close to being competitive, if it isn’t yet. In other words, it’s not something only for people living in an isolated area in a cabin with their own power and storage system.

One of six recently announced projects is linked to the Long Island Power Authority. LIPA requested proposals “to install up to 150 MW of Energy Storage resources that would assist black start operations by serving as a load and also complement planned increases in renewable resources.”

The Hawaii Electric Company also sent out a request for proposals for 60 to 200 MW of energy storage. Energy storage could help balance loads on a grid that is being stretched by new inputs from solar and wind power.

In Los Angeles, a request for proposals was sent out for a 50 MW energy storage system. The California Public Utilities Commission also released a proposal for 1.3 GW of energy storage by 2020.

Also in California, the Imperial Irrigation District (IID is looking into 20 MW to 40 MW of energy storage.

Finally, the state of New Jersey has issued a competitive solicitation for $3 million worth of energy storage.

The energy storage market is growing. Surely, this is a positive sign.

Source: CleanTechnica. Reproduced with permission.

Comments

4 responses to “6 potential US grid-scale energy storage projects”

  1. David H Avatar
    David H

    There are frequent editorials on energy storage that refer to energy storage in MW whereas I am sure they mean MWh (Mega Watt hours). Can comments?

    1. John Silvester Avatar
      John Silvester

      When referring to energy storage systems there are two relevant specifications, maximum output (power) in MW and energy storage in MWh or Jules. So for a hypothetical energy storage system of 1MW 2MWh the system would be able to supply 1MW of electricity for 2 hours.

      Any reference to energy stored should always be in Wh

      When used properly either can be correct.

    2. Miles Harding Avatar
      Miles Harding

      Or both…
      Both the power (MW) and the energy storage (MWh) are important, but it seems that journalists get confused by these apparently similar units and frequently only report one.

  2. David H Avatar
    David H

    John, Thanks for clarifying that. So when we are talking about “storage” capacity we should be using Watt hours.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.