ACT solar farm proposal could face changes

ACT environment minister Simon Corbell has hinted that changes may be made to plans for a 7MW solar farm that was to be developed at Uriarra, west of Canberra.

As we reported in August last year, the ACT government was “swamped” by objections to the solar farm from Uriarra residents, who thought it was too close to the town centre and wanted it pushed back, out of their line of site.

The project – which is to be built by Elementus Energy after winning a tender under the ACT’s solar auction program – attracted 122 submissions, with only six in favour, and has been stuck in planning phase for two years.uriarra

But a Canberra Times report on Wednesday quoted Minister Corbell as saying that the government was at “an important point” in negotiations with the developer, ahead of an expected decision on the project this month.

“I’m not in a position to make further announcements about that at this time but I am seeing positive steps to resolve the concerns that residents have at Uriarra,” Corbell said.

“The developer has indicated to the government that they are willing to revisit the issues of concern to the residents. We welcome that and are looking forward to seeing the outcome.”

Solar farm developer Ashleigh Antflick, of Elementus Energy, said he was working hard for “an outcome that will be satisfactory for everybody”.

Once he had development approval, the array could be operational in six to nine months, he said. He had not sought compensation or a contribution from the government for any change in location or change to the project, he said.

Comments

11 responses to “ACT solar farm proposal could face changes”

  1. Ken Dyer Avatar
    Ken Dyer

    One would hope that the residents would not be reduced to wearing ear plugs to block out the sound solar panels make when exposed to the Sun, or goggles to fend of the clouds of toxic smoke they produce. And residents should be made aware of the giant trucks bringing sunlight as they trundle past the door.

    Perhaps they would be happier with a nice coal power station next door, or even better, a nuclear one. Now there’s a comforting thought, not!

    1. Mark Avatar
      Mark

      You are not being fair to the residents. They never said they were not in favour of solar and, in fact, I would imagine most would be in favour of it.
      What they didn’t want was for the site to be too close to the town and out of site and, considering it is sunlight we are talking about that can be picked up anywhere, this is not an unreasonable request.

    2. Raahul Kumar Avatar
      Raahul Kumar

      I agree the residents are ridiculous idiots. I would any day have a solar plant over the coal equivalent.

  2. Ronald Brakels Avatar
    Ronald Brakels

    It seems to me the simple solution is to put it on roofs. A small incentive might be all it takes to get another 7 megawatts put on roofs. But there’s no need to put it on private buildings. Seven megawatts isn’t that much and I’m sure there are schools, council depots, libraries, hospitals, and so on that all have roofs that could have solar put on them. In fact, for obvious reasons, to build a solar farm when hospitals don’t have PV on their roofs is kind of crazy.

    1. Alastair Leith Avatar
      Alastair Leith

      You wouldn’t believe how much trouble I had getting an aerial photo of just one hospital/healthcare centre in Australia with a relatively large amount of SolarPV. Harvey Bay, and a retirement village in rural Victoria only leads I got in weeks of on/off searching.

      1. Ronald Brakels Avatar
        Ronald Brakels

        Yep, Hervey Bay has the only hospital with a significant amount of solar in Australia I know of. And I have to say, if one is going to put solar on a new hospital, build the hospital first, prepare space for solar and wiring, and then have people bid to install the system. Arranging it early just tends to lock in a high installation price.

        1. Alastair Leith Avatar
          Alastair Leith

          Got a photograph of a couple of solar HW units (and I mean just a couple) on the roof of Royal Children’s too :-). That hospital actually has some good ESD elements like a subterranean thermal labyrinth for pre-cooling/heating air in the ‘main street’ void area, chilled beams in one patient room section where other hospital constraints didn’t preclude them, sun blockers, especially those ones on south facing windows (ain’t it always the way) and a few other things I forget now.

          Was wondering why the roof not overloaded with solarPV though… maybe they are reserving it for a second Ronald McDonald restaurant or hipster wine bar or something?!

          1. Ronald Brakels Avatar
            Ronald Brakels

            I suppose that if an exisiting hospital already has adequate emergency generating capacity and there are other roofs where it would be cheaper to install the PV, that might be a reason for leaving the roof bare. Or if the buildings were expected to be demolished too soon to make PV worthwhile that could also be a reason. But at current installation costs not having PV on the roofs of public buildings is often simply a waste of taxpayers’ money. State governments can have costs of capital under 3% at the moment. That allows even big electricity users that only pay a marginal cost of around 15 cents a kilowatt-hour to easily save money with rooftop solar.

          2. Alastair Leith Avatar
            Alastair Leith

            Yes, it’s just not in the thinking as yet but you’re right once it’s in their thinking it will quickly be normalised I expect just like other financing norms. This ESD was outsourced by the Architects (from memory Bates Smart) to a consulting Engineering practice. The ESD Engineer I spoke to wasn’t enamoured of the tri-gen (thankfully) but I gather the decision to go with it was made elsewhere in the process. I think there’s been a grant specifically for tri-gen that’s driven the recent popularity of co/tri-gen in local councils and govt utilities with the prospect of ‘free money’ to do something that looks good for the environment. Even if developing a massive CSG infrastructure in this country is one of the silliest energy pathways we could take. And that’s where gas will increasingly be coming from.

  3. john Avatar
    john

    What on earth are they objecting about?
    PV sucking the sun power?
    Honestly some in the tin hat brigade actually say this.

  4. Alan S Avatar
    Alan S

    Well the ACT doesn’t have any fossil-fuelled power generation themselves so you can understand their hyper-sensitivity. I wonder if a view of Parliament House increases or decreases property prices.
    Here in Adelaide we have a good view of Torrens Island gas fired PS and the good folks of Port Augusta have two brown coal stations on their doorstep.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.