rss
5

Abbott’s wind energy review a waste of taxpayer money

Print Friendly

The Abbott government has ignored all previous evidence on the matter to announce yet another review of wind energy and human health.

According to The Canberra Times, the Abbott government will pursue an ‘independent program’ investigating wind energy and health, even though a report by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)  has been completed and is awaiting ministerial sign off.

Is another review needed? Here are a few points to consider…

1. Independent studies already conclude wind energy is clean, safe

There’s already a wealth of independent knowledge on wind energy and health. There are now 19 reviews by credible health bodies which show wind farms are clean and safe.

In 2010, Australia’s authority on medical health research, the NHMRC, published a rapid review of wind energy and health. It concluded:

The health effects of many forms of renewable energy generation, such as wind farms, have not been assessed to the same extent as those from traditional sources. However, renewable energy generation is associated with few adverse health effects compared with the well documented health burdens of polluting forms of electricity generation.

There are no direct pathological effects from wind farms and that any potential impact on humans can be minimised by following existing planning guidelines.

In May 2013, the Victorian Department of Health released a review on the subject, concluding:

There is no evidence that [wind turbine] sound which is at inaudible levels can have a physiological effect on the human body. This is the case for sound at any frequency, including infrasound.

(Victorian Premier Dennis Napthine’s decision to chip in $100,000 to fund the Abbott review suggests he doesn’t have confidence in the Victorian Department of Health.)

State planning bodies have joined these public health authorities with the assessment that wind energy is clean and safe. In 2013, the New South Wales Planning Assessment Commission and Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal dismissed wind energy/health scare claims when they approved the Bodangora and Cherry Tree Range wind farms.

Decisions in the real world are being made on the back of existing research. Planning bodies wouldn’t approve wind farms, nor would developers  build them if there was a risk to the public.

2. The NHMRC has a new report ready to go

The NHMRC has completed a review of wind energy and health. The review is reportedly sitting on the desks of Environment Minister Greg Hunt, and Energy Minister Ian MacFarlane.

Announcing a new review while keeping the NHMRC’s findings secret looks suspicious. The government will have to make the report public or it will once again face charges of secrecy and cover up. These charges have plagued Immigration Minister Scott Morrison and ‘Operation Sovereign Borders’ since taking office in September 2013. And they could spread to the energy and environment portfolios.

If the Abbott government sweeps the NHMRC report under the carpet, it’ll be on its way to a trend of secrecywhich is obviously a disadvantageous reputation for any government.

3. Abbott’s posturing on wind/health – favours for friends? 

The Abbott government’s announcement satisfies the wishes of the anti-wind farm Liberals who are ideologically opposed to renewable energy.

The Prime Minister’s hand-picked business advisor Maurice Newman is staunchly opposed to wind energy. Mr Newman has threatened to take legal action against farmers who install wind turbines near his rural property in Crookwell, NSW. Newman will well-known for tirades against wind farms; the popular Howard government policy, the Renewable Energy Target; and denying the science of climate change.

The links between Australia’s most active wind farm opposition group, the Waubra Foundation, has links to the Liberal party. Former Liberal politicians Michael Wooldridge and Alby Schultz hold positions at the organisation. The foundation has frequently argues for more research on the subject. And that is what the Abbott government is delivering.

Prime Minister Abbott’s posturing on wind energy looks like favours for friends.

4. Anti-wind strategy of doubt and delay

Anti-wind activists have a track record urging more research, while ignoring the 19 reviews who show wind energy is clean and safe.

High-calibre research conducted by the NHMRC and Victorian Department of Health costs hundreds of thousands of dollars out of the public purse. It also diverts limited public resources from investigating real public health issues.

Why waste more taxpayer money on another study when wind farm opponents have already made up their mind?

5. Australians have made up their minds on wind energy

All available public polling shows wind energy enjoys strong public support. Wind energy is the cheapest form of generation. It creates jobs and drought-proof income for farmers while addressing climate change.

Polling by Essential Research conducted in June 2013 shows massive 76 percent of Australians support building more wind farms. Wind energy is even highly popular among Coalition voters, with 71 percent supporting more wind farms.

It’s puzzling that a Prime Minister who has suffered a significant drop in support in the polls would stall the popular wind energy sector.

It’s in the interest of Prime Minister Abbott to pursue policies that reflect mainstream public opinion. Yes 2 Renewables urge the PM to listen to the Australian public, rather than kowtowing to radical fringe opinion.

Conclusion

The Abbott government’s decision to undertake another investigation into wind farms and health is unnecessary. It benefits Liberal party mates and anti-wind farm campaigners at the taxpayers’ expense.

RenewEconomy Free Daily Newsletter

Share this:

  • Sean

    Please! this government is all about corrupt kickbacks for their mates, and sneeky taxes (in the form of guaranteed rates of return on electricity network investment – owned by the liberal party controlled state governments.)

  • howardpatr

    Abbott will make much of the corruption and criminality in the building industry but his actions with respect to yet another review of wind farms, to placate mates like Maurice Newman, also has the stench of corruption.

    Along with the likelihood that Abbott will use Alan Moran of the Institute of Public Affairs to produce a new Renewable Energy Target that will be in line with the thinking of Abbott’s new adviser on anthropogenic climate change and renewable energy technology, Maurice Newman, perhaps these matters should be referred to the AFP.

  • George Papadopoulos

    Leigh, that professor from Sydney Uni once called these studies “international reviews” – interesting avoidance of that term in your article.

    In case you aren’t aware NONE of the 19 reviews actually engaged in primary research – just looking for published research. The Abbot Government study seems like it is going to listen to the victims and makes sense of their stories.

  • DogzOwn

    Why bother with investigation and all this fuss? Doesn’t Phoney Tony’s mate, Cardinal Pell have exclusive rights to all perceptions of truth? Or are they amusing themselves by abusing themselves? When will Ian MacFarlane speak out to reiterate opinion that wind is the only energy source we can roll out fast enough to meet emission reduction commitments under international treaties?

  • Guest

    “Clean energy is one of the world’s fastest growing industries, and already makes up 20 percent of the world’s energy supply.” http://clmtr.lt/c/CNR0Bbr