US billionaire Tom Steyer to push clean energy agenda

CleanTechnica

Often, billionaires are associated with the fossil fuel industry. However, the trend seems to have been changing in recent years. From T. Boone Pickens investments in wind energy, to Bill Gates championing clean technology and Richard Branson’s passion for biofuels, the list is growing.

You can add another one to the list…

Meet Tom Steyer, a billionaire hedge fund manager, who is worth $1.3 billion. Recently, he announced he is leaving Farallon Capital. Steyer plans to devote more time towards both charitable and political causes, according to a Reuters article.

One of them is the upcoming Proposition 39 in California, which he helped put on the November ballot. If successful, the bill would look to stamp out loop holes that benefit out-of-state corporations in California. Under the new bill, if it passes, such companies would pay taxes based on sales within the state.

Proposition 39 would also put half of $1 billion raised from the new taxes into clean energy and energy efficiency jobs within the first five years.

Steyer, who has put an astonishing $21.9 million towards the proposal, believes it’s vital to rapidly moving off coal and towards a clean energy future:

His plan: “We immediately get off coal. We move to something that we actually can live with, and proves we can do it in a way that provides a ton of jobs, you know, improves our health, and sets us on a profitable path for the long-term, where we are not causing massive destruction.”

This is not the first time Steyer has been involved in environmental propositions. In 2010, he put $6 million against Proposition 23, which would have weakened greenhouse gas regulations in California.

More billionaires like Steyer in the clean energy arena is a good move, as this infant industry needs strong financial backing against the dirtiest players in the energy game.

Comments

One response to “US billionaire Tom Steyer to push clean energy agenda”

  1. Nathan Avatar
    Nathan

    Thanks for the article!

    Nice to see this effect gaining coverage. As an Aussie reporting on energy in Germany, I’d like to point out one problem, though: The price of carbon. It’s relatively high in Australia compared to Europe, where pathetic CO2 prices are encouraging gas plants to be shut in favour of the dirtiest coal plants.
    Sure, gas is expensive in Europe for a number of reasons. But the languishing carbon price is helping make sure the least-worst fossil fuel (and also the most flexible to back up renewables) has been pushed to the very back of the merit order. Right now the European Commission is looking at a way of boosting the CO2 price by ‘backloading’ some of the scheme’s auctioned permits to the end of the decade. Even if they can get political agreement on this, some carbon analysts think the measure will at best only prevent a further collapse in the price. Australia joins Europe’s ETS in 2015 – will that have the ironic effect of saving Australian coal?

    I know a lot of smart people say an ETS remains the most efficient way of dealing with the climate problem, but I can’t help thinking a tax would be simpler and more effective. Not least for businesses.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.