Global PV in the balance: Can we get it right?

A number of important things are happening right now in the global PV market that are likely to shape the next few years in PV.

Firstly, the German government is set to announce a compromise deal on FIT’s tomorrow. Reportedly, the proposed 20-30 per cent cuts in FIT’s will proceed in the worlds largest PV market, but  incentives will be optimised towards 10-40kW systems with FIT’s around $US 0.231c kWh. Larger systems also continue to get support, but at a lower $US 0.206c kWh.

What’s important about this is its demonstrates the high value of PV in smaller system sizes – and arguably where the energy is used “behind the meter” and used for self consumption. This is trend we are seeing in Australia too, albeit with a distinctly different attitude towards the value of PV energy.

Secondly as the worlds largest market, what happens in Germany affects the global supply and demand balance. Arguably, a 20-30 per cent FIT cut will slow demand and could exasperate the oversupply situation if other markets don’t absorb the excess. Price declines could counter this, but this seem unlikely in the near term given the low profitability across the industry.

The German government has also put a big line in the sand too; once the cumulative installed capacity hits 52GW, the FIT support will cease. This is roughly in line with previous modelling by the Government which set long term targets for PV penetration at around 25 per cent of total generation capacity. However, even if German market  demand slows by (say) 30 per cent on current levels, the 25 per cent/52GW target would be reached by around 2017; 5 years ahead of schedule.

If this plays out, we could see further (or earlier) cuts to tariffs with flow on affects to the rest of the world. Germany matters.

On a related subject, GTM research have just released some new data on the global supply and demand mix too.

In their new PV Technology, Production and Cost Outlook: 2012-2016 report, they paint a picture of continuing oversupply in PV manufacturing and have predicted that capacity retirements (closure of factory’s) are inevitable.

To put it in perspective, current global capacity is around 29GW HIGHER than demand, today. Good for low prices. Bad for profit.

Even taking into account the forecasts for demand growth, they estimate that as much as 21GW of capacity will have to be retired by 2015. That’s potentially a whole-lotta product warranty with no future home.

Balancing this is the the potential for surges in demand. Historically, massive demand has been created, often unexpectedly, when countries have announced new programs and it’s why forecasting is so hard. Arguably, if the price forecasts of around $US 0.45c W for 2015 production costs are right (even lower in some cases) then we may see PV demand surging even more strongly than currently predicted.

The potential for China, India and perhaps even Japan to create significant new demand certainly exists; particularly if avoiding closures and job losses are vital, such as we see in China.

Supply and demand forecasts are notoriously difficult, and I recently looked at a range of historical PV industry forecasts produced over the last 15 years. The majority of demand forecasts (looking forward 5-10 years)  were wrong by a factor of 10; thats right demand was 10X stronger than most predicted. However, the massive annual growth rates are less and less plausible as the industry gets bigger.

If GTM are close to right,  the PV industry’s problems are far from over but I’m going to go out on a limb and project that demand will exceed our (their) wildest expectations. Lets just hope we don’t have to go through too much murk before industry gets the balance right.

Nigel Morris is Director of SolarBusinessServices

Comments

One response to “Global PV in the balance: Can we get it right?”

  1. kyle Avatar

    I just read they announced: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/27/germany-solar-idUSL6E8HREOL20120627

    I think though the Reuters press release has a big typo because “52 GW installation cap…” You know that can’t be right. Their entire installed base is just over 20 GW. (you know that…)

    “Historically, massive demand has been created, often unexpectedly, when countries have announced new programs and it’s why forecasting is so hard.” You really got my attention with that. That’s been bothering me awhile. I love this industry more than anyone knows; but I want to play “devils advocate” for a moment: Is it possible that that the unpredictability you just addressed becomes the industry’s single greatest enemy over time as we dive deeper and deeper into/beyond grid parity territory with everything else in our favor? The incentives made sense when solar was so much more expensive than even nuclear; but that’s not nearly so true anymore and all other things equal annual cost reductions are a default condition indefinitely…and I just sense that the new grid parity journey is of far higher import than most care to admit (I detect a different perception on this website, though). Perhaps we should be paring back the demands for incentives (slowly??) and demanding laws that give easy access…which is what Germany’s compromise seems to do, pair back incentives. too much??

    It seems to me that the incentives start becoming this huge bargaining chip that inevitably fractures at some point with unpredictability like you described, hindering smooth global growth and delaying passage of other much more meaningful legislation – like laws that let anyone in the market offer PPAs. I just read that California’s Sungevity is offering a PPA alternative in Australia…And we can’t even get them in Georgia! As soon as debating the PPA’s comes up here, the first argument thrown out against new PPA legislation is subsidies. So subsidies can be a double-edged sward and be used aggressively to throttle free market legislation.

    I guess I’m suggesting if there is somewhat of a choice between advocating subsidies and making markets free and open – Why not go much more aggressively after the open markets at this point now that we are at grid parity.

    I think Germany matters, too. Especially because of the cultural mindset and the dedication…almost as much as the metrics. My hunch is the tempered incentive cuts don’t shut them down. I’m sure it will hurt.

    I got this feeling during the controversy that the the push for incentive cuts in Germany was less a matter of costs getting out of hand than utility incumbents playing “chicken” with the government, “we’re not going to build anymore base gas plants if…” Am I wrong? Well that could be a good sign long-term. As long as a baseload demand is somehow guaranteed if you have to have it you can always find somebody to build the base plants. I got the feeling Merkel was letting deep pockets steer her.

    Here is what really bothered me about Germany: The press posturing became really aggressive to justify the cuts. They did expand solar incredibly fast but it’s still only about 3% of aggregate energy capacity. For Utilities to prance and preen, “That’s just too much!” And for Merkel to give them the kind of support she did was very disturbing to me. At some point they probably should throttle incentives a little…but tone is everything. I guess I’m beginning to question Merkel’s motives a great deal. True leadership I think would have said, “We can probably temper the incentives a little with all this stellar growth!” This is SUCH a great problem! That’s not what she did. She said, “Uh oh, we’ve got this really big problem. We’ve got to cut this. It’s outta hand.” Well it may have been fast but it’s never ever too much and 3% is hardly dominating the economy. Talk about killing the wind in a country’s sails win its so proud of its achievements! Seems to me almost as if they spun the press a little to steal some German pride. Well I hope the German population has the staying power to fight the battle with utilities; and I hope they somehow learn that they remain a great inspiration.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.